rozPoznańia sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki ) The Court has held that these remedies are effective in respect of the excessive length of pending judicial proceedings (see Michalak

Mr Karol Michalčík (the fourth applicant) is a Slovak national who was born in 1953 and lives in Bratislava. He is a member of the first applicant association. 6.

both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Michalak

Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-V, and Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005).

xa0; claim under section 5 of the 2004 Act and an action for damages under section 16 of the 2004 Act in conjunction with Article 417 of the Civil Code to be effective remedies (see, respectively, Michalak

    For a more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic legal provisions see Michalak v.

Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, § 40, ECHR 2005 ‑ V; and Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, § 41, 1   March 2005).

It has held that these remedies are effective in respect of the excessive length of pending judicial proceedings (see Michalak v.   Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005, and Charzyński v.