Both applications have been filed by the same applicant and have the same factual and legal background.

Scope of civil rights / III.

If this would have been the case, their names would have been recorded in reports, investigation documents or custody registers.

Article 66 “(1) A person accused of or charged with a criminal offence does not have to prove his innocence.

As the Government have failed to raise such an objection, it follows that the present application cannot be rejected by the Court on the grounds that the domestic remedies have not been exhausted. 31.

    Please have in mind that your letters are being opened here in my absence and probably photocopied, as it happened with the last one. ...”

We shall have to shake the dust off those volumes once more.

27 above), which he would have been unable to do.

, and they could have developed their defence position beforehand.

was clear that the final judgment regarding the criminal allegations could have been reached more quickly.

His wife and children are Russian citizens who have spent all their lives there.

/INQUIMBERT G., avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER, avocat postulant substitué par Me Romain FONTES, de la SCP CHRISTOL I.

Furthermore, it cannot be said that the Netherlands’ authorities have shown ignorance or inaction towards the applicant’s situation.

    The relevant part of Article 48 § 2 provides: “Everyone shall have the right to have his matter ... heard without undue delay ...” 35.     Article 127 reads as follows: “1.

, avocat au barreau de LYON, toque : 2311 assisté de Me Fadi KARKOUR de la SCP KARKOUR LAPLAZE, avocat au barreau de TOULOUSE INTIMES : M.

COUR D'APPEL DE RENNES ARRÊT DU 21 JANVIER 2025 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ Président : Madame Véronique VEILLARD, présidente de chambre Assesseur : Monsieur Philippe

In any event, traces of any injuries would have disappeared by then. 58.

In their view, such evidence should have emanated in particular from an “effective investigation”.

    The Court reiterates that it would be unfair to request the applicants whose cases have already been pending for many years in the domestic system and who have come to seek relief at the

    Since 15 June 1999 the disputed premises have been occupied by the limited liability company, “P.” 38.