Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 6.

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

    The applicant complained that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

    On 16 May 2004 the Adigeni Court of First Instance decided to place the applicant in pre-trial detention for three months.

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the domestic courts failed to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the applicant’s pre-trial detention.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)

    The applicants complained principally that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

General provisions on pre-trial detention Article 122 “(1) As soon as the grounds for pre-trial detention cease to exist, the detention shall be lifted and the detainee released. (2) When deciding on pre-trial

If the application concerns the extension of pre-trial detention, copies of all investigation documents produced since the last decision on pre-trial detention shall be attached to the application sent

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 184 April 2015 Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova (referral) - 23755/07 Judgment 16.12.2014 [Section III] Article 5 Article 5-3 Reasonableness of pre-trial

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)

Moreover, as confirmed by medical certificates, the applicant (who was sixty at the time) suffered from a number of illnesses requiring in-patient treatment, which was unavailable in pre-trial detention

    At the pre-trial stage the applicant was committed to the hospital for charged and convicted persons in Trenčín on two occasions, namely between January and February 2012 and March and June

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the domestic courts failed to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the applicants’ pre-trial detention.

    On the same date, the first-instance court confirmed the applicant’s pre-trial detention, holding that the circumstances under which it had ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention had

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the domestic courts failed to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the applicants’ pre-trial detention.