1er octobre 2014 sur un jugement rendu le 18 juin 2012 par le conseil de prud'hommes - formation paritaire de FORBACH et l'opposant à la VILLE DE FORBACH, ainsi qu'une question prioritaire de constitutionnalité

Le 5 septembre 2018, le tribunal correctionnel a refusé la transmission d'une question prioritaire de constitutionnalité. 4.

» Enoncé de la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité 4.

Enoncé de la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité 6.

    Upon the applicant's appeal, the Innsbruck Court of Appeal ( Oberlandesgericht ) requested the Constitutional Court ( Verfassungs-gerichtshof ) to review the constitutionality of Article

The applicants then lodged a constitutional complaint against the second-instance judgment, alleging infringements of their constitutional rights to equality before the law, equality before the courts

On 13 December 2004 the Constitutional Court adopted a decision on the constitutionality of the impugned amendments to the Criminal Code.

    Proceedings before the Federal Constitutional Court 9.

The Court of Appeal raised a question of constitutionality that the Constitutional Court declared inadmissible (judgments nos. 186 of 2011 and 252 of 2012).

They further contended that the internal regulations of the Church were incompatible with a number of constitutional rights.

It also found that the constitutional complaint was not of fundamental constitutional significance.

    On 23 May 2008, judgment no. 172 of the Constitutional Court declared ill-founded a question of constitutionality of Law no.

In particular, on 12 March 2020 the Government of the Czech Republic declared a state of emergency on the basis of Constitutional Law no. 110/1998 on Security of the Czech Republic ( ústavní zákon o bezpečnosti

    The relevant provisions of the Constitutional Court Act read: Article 22 “(1) The procedure for the review of the constitutionality and legality of regulations and general acts issued for

    In the meantime, following a request for a review of the constitutionality of the above-mentioned Government Decision, on 22 June 2017 the Constitutional Court declared it unconstitutional

In the Constitutional Court 19.

       In May 1993 the applicant also initiated proceedings before the Constitutional Court as to the constitutionality and legality of the Privatisation Act and the Denationalisation

The applicant organisation lodged a constitutional complaint, challenging the constitutionality of Article 353/A of the Criminal Code, which was dismissed by the Constitutional Court on 5 March 2019.

On 11 December 2000 the Constitutional Court rejected the complaint as inadmissible. On 27 March 2001 the applicant filed a constitutional complaint challenging the constitutionality of the 1999 Act.