CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

42 695 résultats pour « Alefeld »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1004JUD000426106

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2022

4 octobre 2022

The applicants’ alleged ill-treatment and THE investigation THEREOF The applicants’ arrests and alleged ill-treatment 8.

Source officielle

Page 33 sur 2135

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14347

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2024

25 juin 2024

Accordingly, individual instances of alleged Convention violations were outside the scope of the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206665

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2020

16 novembre 2020

The applicants’ arrests and alleged ill-treatment and investigation The applicants’ arrests and alleged ill-treatment On different dates and locations (see Appendix No. 2) the applicants were arrested

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216JUD002689302

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2008

16 décembre 2008

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0201DEC000412569

Admin. suprême

1 février 1971

1 février 1971

As to the facts   In its observations the respondent Government has not discussed in detail the facts alleged by the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1272

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2009

13 octobre 2009

She also alleged that two years previously the applicant, then aged fourteen, had been detained and subjected to torture after taking part in a demonstration with her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110

Admin. suprême

11 avril 1997

11 avril 1997

Whereas the applicant complained of the length of proceedings in the Italian civil courts, to which he is a party, and of the lack of independence and impartiality of one of the courts concerned, and alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1130DEC003880302

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2006

30 novembre 2006

He also alleged a violation of Article   7 § 1 of the Convention as there was nothing in his acts which constituted a criminal offence under domestic law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003677802

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2007

6 mars 2007

He alleged that the domestic courts erred in the assessment of the facts and in their application of the law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171881

Admin. suprême

7 février 2017

7 février 2017

On the same day, a police officer went to see the place of the alleged incident and reported that he had not spotted anything for the attention of the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146016

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2014

8 juillet 2014

    On 22 June 2009 the applicant’s lawyer filed another complaint addressed to the Chief Prosecutor of Georgia in which he, inter alia , again raised the issue of alleged ill-treatment of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204693

Admin. suprême

25 août 2020

25 août 2020

breach of the principle of legal certainty, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and an alleged breach of the applicant’s property rights, as guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-236029

Admin. suprême

28 août 2024

28 août 2024

Application no. 79083/17 Artur Volodymyrovych BOYAROV against Ukraine and 3 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 28 August 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4541

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2003

4 décembre 2003

law provided insufficient protection to victim of an alleged act of rape: violation Facts : The applicant was fourteen years and ten months old when she claims to have been raped by two men, A. and P.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249349

Admin. suprême

27 février 2026

27 février 2026

conviction and punishment without law and alleged violation of the right to fair trial within reasonable time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-8954

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2013

3 octobre 2013

The Government alleged that a group of some fifty people had gathered and started marching while shouting anti-government slogans.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224844

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2023

29 avril 2023

2023   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 43411/17 Slavko LAKATOŠ and Others against Serbia lodged on 29 May 2017 communicated on 29 April 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208225

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2021

29 janvier 2021

    Has the applicant exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article   35 §   1 of the Convention, concerning her complaint about the Serbian authorities’ alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201745

Admin. suprême

6 février 2020

6 février 2020

Secondly, the applicant submits that his right to be heard by an independent and impartial tribunal was violated due to the alleged financial interests of a Supreme Court Justice sitting on the panel in

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1711271-1793971

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2006

21 juin 2006

They alleged complicity in voluntary homicide, the destruction of property by an explosive device causing fatal injury, and conspiracy to undermine public order through intimidation and terror.

Source officielle