Given that the applicant had already served more than six years, the Presidium ordered his immediate release.

More specifically, were any of the purposes of the restrictions different from those permitted by the latter provisions?

Igorovych Kyiv Proceedings no. 1 12/07/2018       Proceedings no. 2 13/03/2019   Proceedings no. 1 pending       Proceedings no. 2 pending   Proceedings no. 1 More

likelihood ( dat er ernstig rekening mee moet worden gehouden ) that the suspect will commit a crime ( misdrijf ): -     which, according to law, carries a prison sentence of six years or more

The impugned situation has thus already lasted more than four years since the ratification of the Convention by Bosnia and Herzegovina on 12   July   2002 (the period which fell within the Court

On a more positive note, exercise and recreation yards had been constructed for these blocks.

#Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which

The reasons stated by the investigating judge were: “It appears from the case-file that there are serious indications against the suspect (there is more than a mere suspicion).

[T]herefore, the [new] Criminal Code should be applied with regard to the crime in question as the more lenient law, which it indeed is, as a prison sentence from thirty to forty years is more lenient

    During his time at police custody, on 15 November 1999, the applicant was examined once more, this time at the Şişli Etfal Research Hospital.

As a result the applicant’s housing benefit was reduced by 14%, because the applicant is considered to have one more bedroom than that to which she is entitled (as the house has 3 bedrooms for 2 people

(b)     did it pursue one or more legitimate aims referred to in Article 8   §   2 of the Convention?

They also submitted that the applicant had not yet served more than 15 years of his prison term at the time when he had lodged his appeal with the Constitutional Court.

In particular, the applicant, who was a pilot, pointed to certain irregularities in the company, more specifically that one of his colleagues had not had necessary qualifications for piloting an airplane

  330‑ ФЗ of 4   December 2007: not effective remedy; inadmissible   Facts – The applicant lodged an application with the European Court more than six months after a decision at cassation

The lack of any aperture in the glass partition to allow the exchange of documents had rendered the lawyers' task even more difficult.

In one of the decisions authorising eviction, the prosecutor noted that the 2003 Act did not allow the existence of more than one religious denomination with the same name and prohibited the use of the

discredit the allegations made in the note: firstly, one juror indirectly admitted to having made remarks and jokes, which in the context of court proceedings take on a different hue from those made in a more

It held, however, that two elements extinguished the applicant’s entitlement to a more lenient sentence, the first being “the particular circumstances in which the offence had been committed”, and the

They had not argued a more specific need. Their opposition to marriage had been based on their view that a registered partnership was a more modern and lighter institution.