the applicant is not, in principle, sufficient to deprive him or her of his or her status as a   “victim”   for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention unless the national authorities have

Zupančič,   Helena Jäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 18 February 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE

Zupančič,   Angelika Nußberger, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar Having regard to the above application lodged on 13 December 2006, Having regard to the comments submitted by

determined whether the charge as amended would have allowed extradition.

He could also have applied for judicial review.

been expected to have read the text on the poster without ever gaining knowledge of the content of the leaflet.

    All convicts sentenced to life imprisonment have to serve their sentences in special-regime correctional colonies.

Therefore, the use of the “complaint about delays” procedure might have speeded up the examination of the case but could not have made up for the delays which had occurred prior to its introduction and

They also complained that they did not have an effective domestic remedy in this regard (Article 13 of the Convention).

On 3 July 2007 the applicant lodged an action to challenge Mr N.’s paternity and to have his own paternity established. In January 2008 Ms S. and the child moved in with Mr N.

Zupančič,   Helena Jäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 March 2008, Having regard to the observations submitted by

M. on grounds that no reasonable suspicion that the suspects had committed the alleged acts could have been established.

In March 2010, the applicant and A lodged an application with the Migration Board ( Migrationsverket ) to have their residence permits extended.

Municipal Court and the Constitutional Court had departed from the constitutional case-law as regards the appreciation of the length of the proceedings and the issue of whether the applicant should have

a decisive influence and which, when a judgment was delivered, was unknown to the Court and could not reasonably have been known to that party, request the Court ... to   revise that judgment. ..

The applicant lastly complained, under Article 13, that he did not have any effective remedy at his disposal as regards his complaints under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention.

The applicant lastly complained, under Article 13, that he did not have any effective remedy at his disposal as regards his complaints under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention.

Zupančič, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   Aleš Pejchal, judges,   Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar .

Zupančič,   Angelika Nußberger, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications, Having regard to the Government’s settlement proposals made to the

He also twice refused to have a check-up with a psychiatrist and did not show any signs of severe depression or mental distress.