CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506DEC006674201
6 mai 2003
The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see, among many
Page 33 sur 42
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0120JUD004833999
20 janvier 2004
On the latter point, what is at stake for the applicant has also to be taken into account (see, among many other authorities, the Philis v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD004309505
28 novembre 2013
Relying on the Court’s case-law, he argued that Article 6 of the Convention applied to all stages of criminal proceedings, including the proceedings whereby a sentence is fixed (see Phillips v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD000767809
13 novembre 2012
position ... with the fullest picture of the developing situation” and had failed to assess the information about the two fires in the context of the previous threats and intimidation: this was not a mere
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1125DEC004387498
25 novembre 2003
Turkey according to which “the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1108DEC003493997
8 novembre 2001
However, the Court points out that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC003411202
18 novembre 2008
35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV; and Philis v. Greece (no. 2) , judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, § 35).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705DEC006991701
5 juillet 2007
Court agrees with the respondent Government that the proceedings before the Austrian courts did not involve the determination of a new criminal charge against the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis , Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513JUD000621908
13 mai 2014
In particular, he submitted that his case could be distinguished from case such as Phillips which concerned serious criminal offences such as drug-trafficking and organised crime, and in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0606DEC002880704
6 juin 2006
THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Philippe Houdart and Mr Jérôme Vincent, are French nationals who were born in 1957 and live in Neuilly-sur-Seine and Paris respectively.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0219DEC001471203
19 février 2004
Referring in particular to the mission report of March 2003 to the Council of Europe, by Alan Phillips, First Vice-President of the Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of
4eme Chambre Section 2
5fddd6ae7e17647af4f2e4e4
20 juillet 2018
Y..., lui criant qu'il n'était qu'une merde, qu'il l'écraserait et lui dire au final qu'il aurait sa peau. L'appareil téléphonique de M.
CHAMBRE SOCIALE SECTION A
63d4ccae92a57405de331608
25 janvier 2023
produire les horaires effectivement réalisés, ce dernier ne pouvant se retrancher derrière une prétendue insuffisance professionnelle de sa salariée, la facilité affichée d'utilisation du logiciel Philea
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0831DEC001977392
31 août 1994
xa0; Application No. 19773/92 by Nicholas PHILIS
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC002351002
16 décembre 2008
President, Rait Maruste, Karel Jungwiert, Renate Jaeger, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Zdravka Kalaydjieva, judges, Zoryana Bortnovska, ad hoc judge, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD000343103
31 juillet 2012
Dean Spielmann, President, Mark Villiger, Karel Jungwiert, Ann Power-Forde, Ganna Yudkivska, Angelika Nußberger, André Potocki, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0725JUD001849616
25 juillet 2017
Serghides, Jolien Schukking, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 27 June 2017, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD001211104
2 septembre 2010
The mere fact that on 1 July 1997 the applicant was acquitted at the first level of jurisdiction could not complicate the proceedings to an extent which would justify their dilatory nature.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705DEC007060214
5 juillet 2016
xa0; Luis López Guerra, President, Helena Jäderblom, Helen Keller, Johannes Silvis, Dmitry Dedov, Branko Lubarda, Pere Pastor Vilanova, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC003804412
21 avril 2015
Therefore the mere fact that a party contends that the dispute gives rise to a question concerning the interpretation of Community law does not mean that the court or tribunal concerned is compelled to