CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0201DEC003230796
1 février 2000
    Article 6, so far as relevant, reads as follows:   “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004DEC000097111
4 octobre 2011
The relevant part of the Code of Criminal Procedure enacted on 2 June 1999 and amended on 27 October 1999 (Official Gazette nos. 58/1999 and 112/1999) reads: Article 484 (a) “Special laws and decisions
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171823
9 février 2017
The decision read as follows: “Neither the Law ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC002141602
19 mai 2005
Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524DEC000624602
24 mai 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0614DEC007509601
14 juin 2005
ECLI:CEDH:001-165302
30 juin 2016
The relevant part of that decision reads as follows: “Point IV [of the operative provisions] is addressed to the tax accounting service with a view to making the relevant entry in the [applicant’s] tax
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108DEC000028303
8 janvier 2004
    Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Azerbaijan of 2000   Article 158 § 5 reads as follows: "The period for detention of the accused person whose case is under consideration
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524DEC007084801
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC007554501
9 juillet 2002
The relevant parts of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention read as follows: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0213DEC007666801
13 février 2003
Such a complaint falls to be examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant parts of which read as follows: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1121DEC000957302
21 novembre 2002
The relevant parts of the Act Amending the Civil Obligations Act ( Zakon o izmjenama i dopunama Zakona o obveznim odnosima – Official Gazette no. 7/1996) read as follows: Section 1 “Section 180 of the
ECLI:CEDH:001-158073
21 septembre 2015
The final judgments’ particulars and the initials of the witnesses, whose statements were read out, are tabulated below. COMPLAINT 6.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161592
23 février 2016
On 21 November 2009 the president of the KFM sent an email to the applicant, the relevant parts of which read as follows: “In my capacity as President of the KFM, I am obliged to draw your attention to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524DEC006145100
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14292
20 février 2024
on an identity check considered to have been discriminatory could fall within the ambit of the right to respect for private life within the meaning of Article   8, such that Article   14, read
ECLI:CEDH:001-145138
28 mai 2014
The relevant part of that decision reads as follows: “... having regard to the fact that the separation of N. from his mother and from a safe environment would without a doubt have harmful and traumatic
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC003657603
It reads, in so far as relevant: “1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131JUD001288802
31 janvier 2006
Section 2, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122DEC000633402
22 novembre 2005
Page 33 sur 1410