On 3 September 2003 the applicant’s solicitors informed the Court that they had advised the applicant’s husband, as her next-of-kin, of the option of continuing with the application on behalf of the estate

Law – Article 8 (a)     Admissibility – The Government had not contested that the first applicant had standing to lodge an application on behalf of his minor son.

  Subsequently, the applicant lodged, on his own behalf and on the behalf of his three surviving children, an action for damages in the Istanbul Administrative Court against the authorities which

It appears that in the period in which the applicant received the unemployment benefit, the Agency paid on his behalf pension contributions to the Pension Fund.

d'Aix-Marseille-Provence a rejeté leur offre conjointe pour l'attribution du marché de maîtrise d'oeuvre pour le suivi des travaux de requalification de l'avenue du Docteur Louis Michelangeli à Roquefort-la-Bédoule

. 1 (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies) The Court notes that the applicants died before the applications were lodged on their behalf

The INPI did not grant the application immediately because “Budweiser Bier” had already been registered as a designation of origin on behalf of a Czechoslovak company, Budejovicky Budvar.

    On 23 January 2006 the first applicant, acting on his own behalf and on behalf of the second applicant and their son Milan Vojnović, submitted a communication to the Human Rights Committee

    On 16 October 2024 the first applicant’s lawyer signed the friendly settlement declaration sent by the Court in the name and on behalf of the deceased first applicant. 8 .

       On 27 October 1994 the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal convicted the applicant of espionage on behalf of the former German Democratic Republic, pursuant to S. 99 para. 1 (1)

it was artificial to distinguish between the two and, secondly, if it was warranted by “exceptional circumstances” precluding the affected companies from bringing the cases to the Court on their own behalf

In particular, Mr Kolobutin lodged complaints on his own behalf and on behalf of his late mother, Ms Kolobutina (see line 1 of Appendix I below).

The Court rejected the application in respect of those applicants, either because their lawyer had lodged the application on their behalf after their death (whereas, according to Article 34, applications

The prosecutor’s office stated that it was intervening on behalf of the defendants because they were pensioners and were in a difficult financial situation.

On 3 April 2012, on behalf of the applicant company in liquidation, Mr   O.   asked the Court to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Court received the Government’s observations and sent them to the applicant’s legal representative in order for her to submit the applicant’s observations in reply and just satisfaction claims on his behalf

    On 3 August 1995 the Chief Executive of the Special Hospital Services Authority lodged, on the applicant's behalf, a complaint with the Press Complaints Commission alleging that the taking

Z... qui affirme « J'ai travaillé du 15 avril 2004 au 30 juin 2007, et j'ai même travaillé sur le chantier «... » à Roquefort la Bédoule aux mêmes moments que Monsieur X...

On 2 February 2006 the General Prosecutor’s Office instituted civil proceedings on behalf of the Government against the Chişinău Municipal Council and the applicant Foundation, challenging the validity