The amount will be paid to their counsel, Mr Jan Thörnhammar, who has been authorised by the applicants to receive payment on their behalf.

She has been living in the Netherlands ever since and has been going to school there since the age of five.

Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Josep Casadevall, President,   Alvina Gyulumyan,   Ján Šikuta,   Dragoljub Popović,

COMPLAINT The applicant company complained that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the “reasonable-time” requirement, laid down in Article   6 § 1 of the Convention.

They also maintained that the RP , which, at the   time, had been in power for a year as part of a coalition, had consistently observed the principle of secularism and respected all religious beliefs

} .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 27998/02 by Michael Joseph

In his statements the accused admitted that it had been his responsibility to guide the vehicle...” 11.

The judge found that the applicant had been provided with proper medical care and medication.

The applicant has never been in contact with the Court directly and introduced her application through her representative Ms Spronken.

    The applicant complained that the United Kingdom authorities' refusal to pay him the social security benefit to which he would have been entitled had he been a woman in a similar position

They further alleged that the flat in question did not exist, since it had been sold to a third person.

S.R.L. had been submitted by him to the Court of Cassation. 19.

of the final decision by which she had been awarded civil damages.

    On the facts, it found that the police intervention had been prompted by a fight that had occurred in the vicinity of the restaurant where the applicant had been drinking with his friends

he had in fact been requesting them to communicate to him the reasons for his discharge.

  The Court held that the applicants had first been officially informed of the inquiry in progress and been affected by it when they were served with notice of the order committing them for trial

He had then gone to the Ministry of the Interior where he had been refused entry but at the door had spoken with an official who had been called.

to the municipality and that, on 31 January 2005, the hospital had been wound up.

He alleged that on 18 August 2008 he had not at all been violent. He had just been upset because his wife and son were constantly taking advantage of him and spending his money.

Nor is the Court called upon to examine whether arguments have been adequately met.