G de restituer les clefs du logement et de la boîte aux lettres ainsi que tous les badges d'accès sous astreinte de 100 euros par jour de retard.

G de restituer les clefs du logement et de la boîte aux lettres ainsi que tous les badges d'accès sous astreinte de 100 euros par jour de retard.

On 5 March 1999 she accompanied the applicant to the block of flats where his daughter lived.

At the time, he was also living in the flat, together with his wife – the third applicant – and her two children. 8.

    On 4 April 2008 the applicant sold his flat, allegedly below the market price, and bought a new flat, having taken out loans from the bank and his family.

It appears that the applicants’ telephone was tapped and their flat was bugged. They allege that the listening device in their flat was planted by one of their neighbours.

It appears that the applicants’ telephone was tapped and their flat was bugged. They allege that the listening device in their flat was planted by one of their neighbours.

building of new flats.

xa0; Violation of Article 13 Aleksandr Plaksin, a Russian national, born in 1965 and living in Pyatigorsk (Russia), complained about the length of the civil proceedings he brought after a fire in his flat

He had been asked by an unknown man he had met outside the flat to leave an extra fifteen metres of wire so that they could be connected inside the flat.

    The police came to the applicant’s flat on the same evening, at about 9.30 p.m.

Greffier lors des débats : Mme Flavie DRILHON.

    The applicants are the owners of a flat in Ghezzano di San Giuliano Terme (Pisa) which had been let to V.F. 9.

    The applicant is usufructuary of a flat owned by her husband A.C., which had been let to G.P. 10.

    On 14 September 1993 the bailiff certified the existence of an action regarding the flat, and on 13 October 1993 the applicant notified A.M. not to enter into the flat, as it contained the

    It appears that, once the block of flats had been built, the LenGESS refused to transfer the stipulated number of flats to the SZS, claiming that the funding raised by the latter had been

to pay to the applicant a subsidy to buy a flat, thus modifying the way to resolve the applicant's housing problem.

They were both referred to the Chełm Remand Centre Governor who considered the complaints ill-founded.

He also requested the first-instance civil court to rule on whether the sale of public housing flats had been valid.

By way of consideration, the SZS was to receive title to a certain number of flats in the completed construction.