On 17/03/2022, Mr Naumov was arrested in Mytishchi for holding a poster that read “Against the special operation”.

18.78pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 67415/14 Anton REZAR

On 27 October 2007 he showed up at a pro-incumbency rally and unfurled a banner that read “Putin better than Hitler”.

Beyond doubt the reader is forced to make a connection with capital crime. (...)

    The applicant, Mr Renad Šeremet, is a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina, who was born in 1966 and lives in Sarajevo. He was represented before the Court by Mr D.

In sum, section   43 of the Constitutional Court Act, read in conjunction with section   416 of the New Code of Criminal Procedure, does not provide a guarantee for successful complainants, in

The trial court read out Ms D.’s pre-trial statements despite the applicant’s and his lawyer’s objections to that effect, having excused Ms D. from appearing in open court.

{ width:22.54pt; display:inline-block } .s25020CC7 { width:160.42pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 44092/05 by Ali Reza

On 19 February 2005 the applicant read a press statement on behalf of a number of non-governmental organisations and the DEHAP (Democratic People’s Party) in Kars.

On 8 April 2009 he read out a press statement concerning the problems of Kurdish people and chanted slogans in favour of the PKK (Kurdish Workers’ Party).

    The relevant parts of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, as in force at the material time, read as follows: Article 281¹ § 1 “No [ordinary] appeal shall lie against judgments rendered

    Relevant domestic law Article 314(2) of the Criminal Code reads as follows: “Anyone who becomes a member of an (illegal) organisation mentioned in the first paragraph of this Article shall

said to be a vector for explaining [original emphasis] reality, would justify attendance for an extended season at a primary [school] for the study of literature and aesthetics, with an obligation to read

On 4 February 2005 several members of the union gathered in front of the Niğde Social Security Institution ( Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu – “the SSK”) Hospital and Y ı lmaz Y ı ld ı z read out the SES’s press

    Is the applicant still a victim of the violation of Article 14 read in conjunction with Article   3 of the Convention upheld by the domestic courts?   2.

applicant’s objections by decisions against which no appeal was available, finding that the Adana Governorship had prohibited making press statements at the place where the demonstrators had gathered and read

Moreover, the applicant complains in substance under Article 5 § 1 read in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention that under Austrian law it would not have been an offence justifying the placement

applicant’s objection by a decision against which no appeal was available, finding that the Sinop Governorship had prohibited making press statements at the place where the demonstrators had gathered and read

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention read alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention that the loss of his licence amounted to an unjustified

Relying upon Article   14 read in conjunction with Article 11, the applicant union complains also of structural discrimination with regard to larger and less diverse trade unions.