de la loi pénale, défaut et contradiction de motifs, manque de base légale ; "en ce que l'arrêt attaqué a déclaré le demandeur coupable d'avoir fait dispenser à titre onéreux des enseignements théoriques

50 km / h ; que cependant la violence du choc et les traces de freinage laissées par son véhicule laissaient craindre de sa part une vitesse excessive ; qu'Alain B... se livre à des comparaisons théoriques

complété l'investigation ne faisait pas à l'heure actuelle l'objet d'un consensus, elle ne pouvait être considérée comme inutile et fautive; que cette absence de consensus relativisait les critiques théoriques

The Government emphasised the Court’s conclusion that those delays did not render the duration of those proceedings at the time of the Constitutional Court’s decisions contrary to the requirement of Article

Under those circumstances, the Kúria ’s lack of reasoning in connection with those aspects seemed to be in line with the domestic procedural rules.

  Thus, the schools are not penal institutions and those residing there, including Section 206 offenders, are not subject to a penal regime.

This is done by the regional court at the request of the regional public prosecutor (Articles 449 and 450 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2005).

On 19 April 2012 the Government of Croatia approved all the procedural actions taken thus far. 8 .

found by the Court in the present judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Lutsenko case and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation

In his view, this cast doubt on the effectiveness of the obligation to submit the impugned declaration.

linked to the identity or the personality of the individual, such as sex, race and religion, not all of the grounds listed can be thus characterised.

In this context, the Court noted that the original aim for which the Pastafarian movement had been founded had been to protest against the introduction into the school curriculum of the state of Kansas

This is also the case where the judicial authorities justify the detention of a suspect by the nature of the offence in question or the severity of the potential sentence prescribed by law (compare also

allegedly inflicted to the first applicant, to the lack of judicial review of the decision to detain the first applicant on remand, to the impossibility of challenging the lawfulness of this detention

general measures had been taken to prevent new violations of the same kind as those found in the present judgment (this information appears in the appendix to this resolution); Having satisfied itself

The Committee has considered the applicants’ complaint on four occasions (see 336 th Report of the Committee on Freedom of Association ; 338 th Report of the Committee on Freedom of Association ; 343 rd

Thus, the criminal limb of Article 6 § 1 does not apply.

The Court notes that the applicants complained about the investigation carried out in this case and the decision to discontinue the proceedings.

The provisions of subsection 4 of this section in relation to assisted return and the awarding of a residence permit and, if appropriate, a work permit for exceptional circumstances for those over sixteen