CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD003049117

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2018

20 septembre 2018

Such a course of events could therefore have been reasonably expected by the applicants, or should have at least been entertained by them, as they themselves had prompted the review of the constitutionality

Page 35 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC006147412

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

Although these provisions have a certain relevance outside the strict confines of criminal law, the national courts have “greater latitude” when dealing with cases concerning civil rights and obligations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD004834512

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2020

11 juin 2020

However, the Government have not adduced any domestic judgments in which a subrogation action brought by a lawyer seeking to have fees fixed by domestic courts in expropriation proceedings deposited with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD004056212

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2017

7 septembre 2017

Thus she should have instituted separate civil proceedings on her own. 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0719JUD001841913

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2018

19 juillet 2018

[H.A.] and [A.K.] have not even apologised; moreover, they have created such an atmosphere that it is impossible to work, since other employees ignore me and avoid contact with me for fear of losing their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC003030513

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

The driver could have been only her or her husband. Neither of them denied that she was driving. 51.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0622JUD007673012

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2021

22 juin 2021

  Not to have been prohibited from [exercising] public functions or rights, 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC007685411

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

    The Court reiterates first of all that under Article 35 § 1 it may only deal with a matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326DEC001377611

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2013

26 mars 2013

The applicant was requested to clarify whether he would like to introduce a new application or to have his communication joined to the existing file.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0704JUD002178806

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2013

4 juillet 2013

persons who have a claim to receive housing in “extraordinary” way under the relevant laws, including persons who have not been provided with housing within the time-limit established by the relevant law

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC000483512

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

He argues that although she denied that her personal relationships may have affected her decisions, even subjective attitude may have actually influenced her decision-making.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD004640009

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2011

18 octobre 2011

The parents have not the right to prevent the communication of the child with its distant ascendants except on serious grounds.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0529JUD000031103

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2008

29 mai 2008

obtained a ruling upholding her right to have her case heard within a reasonable time, as set forth in Article 6   §   1 of the Convention (see Efimenko   v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928JUD001205004

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

To date, however, only thirteen States have signed the Convention and Estonia is the only country to have ratified it. The text includes the following provisions: Article 2 – Intentional offences “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001990092

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1129JUD001328102

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2011

29 novembre 2011

    As to the question whether the effects of a possible violation of the Convention have been redressed, the Court considers that this is the case as the proceedings have been terminated in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD003203610

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2015

12 novembre 2015

    The European Prison Rules apply to persons who have been remanded in custody by a judicial authority or who have been deprived of their liberty following conviction.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD006320610

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2014

31 juillet 2014

    Since 1 November 2005 they have lived apart. According to the applicant, in 2006 she initiated proceedings for dissolution of the marriage in Denmark.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313DEC003954902

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2012

13 mars 2012

examine or have examined witnesses against him ...” i.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD000195310

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2012

12 juin 2012

obtained a ruling upholding his right to have his case heard within a reasonable time, as set forth in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

Source officielle