CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD003049117
20 septembre 2018
Such a course of events could therefore have been reasonably expected by the applicants, or should have at least been entertained by them, as they themselves had prompted the review of the constitutionality
Page 35 sur 100
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC006147412
6 septembre 2016
Although these provisions have a certain relevance outside the strict confines of criminal law, the national courts have “greater latitude” when dealing with cases concerning civil rights and obligations
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD004834512
11 juin 2020
However, the Government have not adduced any domestic judgments in which a subrogation action brought by a lawyer seeking to have fees fixed by domestic courts in expropriation proceedings deposited with
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD004056212
7 septembre 2017
Thus she should have instituted separate civil proceedings on her own. 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0719JUD001841913
19 juillet 2018
[H.A.] and [A.K.] have not even apologised; moreover, they have created such an atmosphere that it is impossible to work, since other employees ignore me and avoid contact with me for fear of losing their
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC003030513
22 janvier 2019
The driver could have been only her or her husband. Neither of them denied that she was driving. 51.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0622JUD007673012
22 juin 2021
Not to have been prohibited from [exercising] public functions or rights, 5.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC007685411
24 janvier 2017
The Court reiterates first of all that under Article 35 § 1 it may only deal with a matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326DEC001377611
26 mars 2013
The applicant was requested to clarify whether he would like to introduce a new application or to have his communication joined to the existing file.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0704JUD002178806
4 juillet 2013
persons who have a claim to receive housing in “extraordinary” way under the relevant laws, including persons who have not been provided with housing within the time-limit established by the relevant law
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC000483512
30 août 2016
He argues that although she denied that her personal relationships may have affected her decisions, even subjective attitude may have actually influenced her decision-making.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD004640009
18 octobre 2011
The parents have not the right to prevent the communication of the child with its distant ascendants except on serious grounds.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0529JUD000031103
29 mai 2008
obtained a ruling upholding her right to have her case heard within a reasonable time, as set forth in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Efimenko v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928JUD001205004
28 septembre 2010
To date, however, only thirteen States have signed the Convention and Estonia is the only country to have ratified it. The text includes the following provisions: Article 2 – Intentional offences “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001990092
22 septembre 2009
The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1129JUD001328102
29 novembre 2011
As to the question whether the effects of a possible violation of the Convention have been redressed, the Court considers that this is the case as the proceedings have been terminated in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD003203610
12 novembre 2015
The European Prison Rules apply to persons who have been remanded in custody by a judicial authority or who have been deprived of their liberty following conviction.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD006320610
31 juillet 2014
Since 1 November 2005 they have lived apart. According to the applicant, in 2006 she initiated proceedings for dissolution of the marriage in Denmark.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313DEC003954902
13 mars 2012
examine or have examined witnesses against him ...” i.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD000195310
12 juin 2012
obtained a ruling upholding his right to have his case heard within a reasonable time, as set forth in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.