In particular, they indicated that the amount of compensation provided for in the Government’s unilateral declarations was low.

The amount for application no. 73478/13 would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment and the amounts for applications nos. 27169/10 and 27028

In particular, he indicated that the amount of compensation provided for in the Government’s unilateral declaration was low.

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that

In particular, she argued that the amounts proposed by the Government were insufficient and did not correspond to the standards established in the Court’s case-law.

In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at

In particular, they indicated that the amounts of compensation provided for in the Government’s unilateral declarations were low.

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declarations as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that

They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1 &

They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1 &

The applicants, who were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declaration, objected to striking the case out because they deemed the proposed amount excessively low.

On 30 April 1998 and 5 August 1998 the due amount was paid to the applicants.

On 17   June 2003 the Regional Court amended its judgment awarding the applicant interest on the above amount.

However, in their observations, the Government had not referred to this amount in respect of the two applications under Section 91 of the Courts Act, but as a reasonable amount in respect of the costs

Court, an amount which should not be unreasonable.

They maintained that the amount of the pensions which would have been paid to the applicants in the absence of that Law was equal to or even lower than the amounts they had actually received. 11.

This adjusted amount (total estimated amount of maximum possible rent from 15 April 2002 to April 2012, plus interest) should serve as a starting point for calculating the final amount of the award. 27

Following the amendment of 1996 it read as follows: “The amount of the one or more pensions received cannot exceed three times the social pension.”

The applicant initiated enforcement proceedings for the payment of the deducted amount.

She also instituted administrative proceedings seeking health insurance rights, but in that set of proceedings the authorities dismissed her request on the ground that her injury did not amount to a work