Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520JUD003440002
20 mai 2008
20 mai 2008
According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018DEC000038008
18 octobre 2011
18 octobre 2011
If a representative has been appointed [by a court] to a party who has been exempted from the obligation to pay court fees, the exemption, to the extent it has been granted, shall extend
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104DEC004911108
4 novembre 2014
4 novembre 2014
At the police station he had twice been checked over by a doctor. After the applicant had complained of pain in his shoulder, he had been taken to hospital. 19.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3171499-3525019
15 juin 2010
15 juin 2010
Secondly, they had not been conducted in an appropriate manner.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3167919-3524879
15 juin 2010
15 juin 2010
Indeed, it seemed that the applicant had been placed in a metal cage simply because that had been the seat where defendants in criminal cases were always placed.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68103-68571
20 juin 2000
20 juin 2000
25 of the Convention, that there had been no violation of Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 and of Article 18 and that no separate issue arose under Article 14.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC003698297
30 mars 1999
30 mars 1999
The applicant was committed to Broadmoor Hospital where he has been detained ever since.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1988967-2095713
3 mai 2007
3 mai 2007
The Court noted that Mr Koçak had not been medically examined at the beginning of his detention.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2131314-2271213
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
Accordingly, the Court concluded that there had been a violation of Article 3.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2900988-3190201
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
that they had been subjected to threats.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2591664-7765088
8 janvier 2009
8 janvier 2009
” but that it had not been possible to identify the person who had fired the missile.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1998794-2107269
13 mai 2007
13 mai 2007
Summary of the judgment [2] Complaints The applicant alleged that the circumstances in which he had been detained and the conditions in which he had been transferred had amounted
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2699182-2950157
9 avril 2009
9 avril 2009
lifted had often not been reasonable.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2363207-2544938
20 mai 2008
20 mai 2008
They maintained that a criminal investigation had been conducted and that evidence had been gathered which shed light on the allegations concerned.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021JUD002956719
21 octobre 2021
21 octobre 2021
Owners thus could not have been blamed for initiating proceedings at that time. 35.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC004748599
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
However, it appears that the applicant has been indicted for tax crimes and has been summoned to appear before the District Court on 5 August 1999.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68445-68913
25 mars 1999
25 mars 1999
raised under Articles 5, 6 and 13 fell to be examined under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, that there had been a violation of this latter provision.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2909811-3196312
27 octobre 2009
27 octobre 2009
Accordingly, the Court concluded unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1120JUD006338800
20 novembre 2007
20 novembre 2007
consider that a friendly settlement had been reached and would consequently consider striking the case out of its list of cases.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3165578-3536746
22 juin 2010
22 juin 2010
On his arrival at the Poarta Albă detention centre Mr Gavriliţă was declared “clinically healthy” by the doctor, as he had been in 2000 when examined by a radiologist.
Source officiellePage 35 sur 136