CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD000762119
4 juillet 2024
July 2018 a magistrate judge of the Kvareli District authorised the investigators to obtain all information possible relating to the telephone calls and text messages sent from and to E.N.’s mobile phone
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211JUD001188422
11 février 2025
On 25   April 2022 the Moscow City Court rejected his appeal. 26.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319DEC002833995
19 mars 2002
After the hospital treatment had lasted for a year and a half, the applicant mother demanded that G. be returned home in April 1993.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0910REP002395494
10 septembre 1999
  The proceedings                  The application was introduced on 5 April 1994 and registered on 25 April 1994.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0924JUD000702504
24 septembre 2009
He had also included Mr L.’s phone number and home address in the record.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD005243599
12 avril 2007
By a further amendment of 1   April 1995 the holder of the post was required to have a higher-education qualification. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0317JUD005019699
17 mars 2005
These commands, which were repeated at intervals throughout the incident, had no apparent effect. 4.     The arrival of the South ARV officers 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510JUD000451209
10 mai 2011
    On 23   April 2005 the applicant absconded, and on 25   April 2005 he was apprehended by the police. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD005216013
12 janvier 2016
This time-limit was extended and appeal submissions were lodged in April 2013. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0523JUD002266213
23 mai 2017
On 27 April 1997 the death penalty issue was discussed by the Baltic Assembly.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0910JUD006946012
10 septembre 2020
Russia , no. 27365/07, § 94, 17   April 2012, and Huseynova v. Azerbaijan , no. 10653/10, § 82, 13 April 2017). 44.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917JUD007546010
17 septembre 2019
    On 27 April 2010 the Court of Cassation upheld the conviction. This decision was deposited with the registry of the first-instance court on 25   May 2010. II.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD001123609
9 avril 2019
TURKEY (No. 2)   (Application no. 11236/09)             JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   9 April 2019     FINAL   09/07/2019      
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD000225712
12 décembre 2017
    On 9 April 2014 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD007164513
19 décembre 2017
    On 28 April 2015 the second applicant instituted proceedings complaining about his conditions of detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1031JUD004585512
31 octobre 2017
In the applicant’s account of the events, altogether six officers and two security guards took part in the ill-treatment, with the apparent intention of extracting his confession to further offences.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0505JUD003527910
5 mai 2015
  Romania , nos. 30911/06 and 40967/06, § 40, 19 April 2011). II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 59.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0302JUD003603717
2 mars 2021
On 24 April 2017 the applicant mother was examined by a gynaecologist of a Szeged hospital. On 25   April 2017 she was referred to the emergency department of the hospital because of sickness.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106JUD005539113
6 novembre 2018
    In a decision of 10 April 2012 the CSM, sitting in plenary session, found that the applicant had acted in breach of her duties of loyalty and propriety.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD002119409
10 octobre 2017
Eight applicants were questioned and received victim status in March and April 2000. Six were granted victim status in April and May 2004, and one in March 2005.
Page 35 sur 38