ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 55.

Germany - 59549/12 Judgment 26.7.2018 [Section V] Article 6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Domestic violence conviction based on strongly corroborated untested evidence by victim refusing to testify

6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Convictions based on statements by absent witnesses: no violation Facts – In November 2007 the first and second applicants, Mr   Horncastle and Mr  

    There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 § 1 taken together with Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention. III.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 34.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 40.

6 § 1 taken together with Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention.

  7377/03, §   32, 13 October 2009), the Government submitted that they were aware of the Court’s case-law under Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention. 21.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention of the unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him on account of his inability to obtain the attendance and

    The applicant considered that his conviction had been based to a decisive extent on the statement made to the investigating judge by J.G. and underlined that, in breach of Article 6 § 3 (

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION TAKEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE 6   §   3   (c) IN THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS 30.

She invoked Article 6 §   1 and § 3 (c) of the Convention. However, the Court finds it appropriate to examine the case under Article 6 § 1 and § 3 (d) (see Guerra and Others v.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 61.

T. invoqua notamment l'article 6 § 3 d) de la Convention et contesta la lecture des déclarations de N. 21.

In this respect, he relied on Article 6 § 3 (c) and (d) of the Convention, which in so far as relevant read as follows: “3.

Croatia (nos. 22238/13 and 6 others, §§ 65 and 66, 14   May 2020, with further references). THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 ( c ) OF THE CONVENTION 15.

    In the light of the above, the Court considers that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 3 (d) taken together with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. II.

Under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) he complained that he had been unable to examine the driver of the other car involved in the incident because under the relevant Ukrainian law the courts could not order

    The Court concludes that there has been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention. II.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 34.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 15.

    The applicant complains of a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention on account of the trial court’s refusal to hear two important witnesses for his defence.