In the applicant’s case, it was found, in relation to the evaluation of assets, that she had made a false declaration and concealed her and partner’s acquisition of a flat.

Both agencies were part of the executive and took such decisions without hearing the foreign national concerned.

In those statements X confirmed she had had consensual sex with S.Y. on two occasions prior to the alleged rape, although on both occasions his friends had persisted in entering the room despite being

Public sale of the applicant’s flat and distribution of the proceeds 16 .

Apparently, on 6 March 2006 the police came to the applicant’s flat. The applicant refused to let them enter the flat. The police forced the door, carried out a search and seized some evidence.

    In § 17 of the principal judgment the Court noted that the following properties had been forfeited from the applicants: a flat in Varna, and a flat, an office, a garage and a share of a plot

Although both decisions were based on the same incident, the offences were different in nature and purpose. II.   RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 16 .

    On 21 July 2003 the applicant sought enforcement through the seizure of the above-mentioned flat. 10.

The flat in question was valued at AMD   8,300,000. 22.     On an unspecified date the bailiff sold the flat at a public auction for AMD 2,220,600.

He rented a flat, found a job and stayed there until December 2017. During that time he saw Yu. only on a few occasions, E.Ch. preventing any regular contact.

Although both the military judge and the central investigating judge had opened a criminal preliminary investigation into the death, under domestic law, jurisdiction could have been asserted only if the

Given her young age, she was not called to testify in court: the video-recorded statements were disclosed at the hearings and viewed by both first-instance and appellate courts.

The Court further decided that both parties were responsible for the breaking up of the marriage.

She had seen them carrying the TV set and video player out of the flat.

    On 2 July 2004 a forensic medical expert examined the applicant and documented multiple bruises on both eyelids, the left temple, both earlobes, the chest, the knees, the left shoulder, and

Metin Can took the men back to his flat and called Hasan   Kaya on the telephone. Hasan Kaya arrived at the flat.

The men did not produce any documents to identify themselves; they beat and handcuffed both brothers, put sacks over their heads and took them away in two different vehicles.

    On 15 November 1995 the bailiff evicted the tenant, who, being elderly and sick, was transferred by ambulance to a council flat which was allocated to her by the Municipality of Rome.

Finding that she could not return to Vitebsk, she and her husband rented a flat in Minsk.

    Proceedings concerning the applicant's late father's flat The applicant's father lived in a rented flat until his death in 1994.