The autopsy report found that he died as a result of direct blows by blunt objects causing 89 lesions on his body (arms broken, multiple fractures of his ribs and thorax, multiple traumatisms and

They submitted that the Tax Rectification Committee was an administrative body not a court to which Article 6 § 1 applied.

  35382/97, ECHR   2000-IV; and Philis v. Greece (no. 2), judgment of 27   June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, § 35). 67.

  On 6 September 1985 the applicant attended an interview at M.E.L., a member of the Philips Electronic and associated industries group, in connection with a vacancy for a financial analyst.

Consequently, States are dispensed from answering to an international body for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system (see Ilhan v.

Malta; 27.8.1991, Philis v. Greece; 26.11.1991, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom; 25.6.1992, Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland; 9.12.1994, Lόpez Ostra v. Spain; 8.6.1995, Yağcı and Sargιn v.

Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by eight United Kingdom nationals, Ms Ruth Hatton, Mr Peter Thake, Mr John Hartley, Ms   Philippa

Article   25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by eight United Kingdom nationals, Ruth Hatton, Peter   Thake, John Hartley, Philippa

Court H.R., Golder judgment of 21 January 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, para. 36; Philis judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, p. 20, para. 59).

Therefore, the court (or judge) as a body (or individual) administering justice cannot be a defendant in civil litigation, as the law provides another mechanism for correcting mistakes and irregularities

the applicant broke into a family home, stabbed to death a man, his wife and their adult son and repeatedly raped their 18   year ‑ old daughter, having first dragged her past her father’s body

On the latter point, what is at stake for the applicant has also to be taken into account (see Philis v.

takes the view that it does not have to examine the case under Article 13 as its requirements are less strict than, and are here absorbed by, those of Article 6 (see, among many other authorities, Philis

xa0; Luis López Guerra, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   George Nicolaou,   Helen Keller,   Johannes Silvis,   Dmitry Dedov,   Pere Pastor Vilanova, judges, and Stephen Phillips

Mitrtskhulava, lawyers practising in Tbilisi; they were joined later by Mr Jarlath Clifford, Mr   Philip Leach, Ms Joanne Sawyer and Ms Jess Gavron, lawyers from the European Human Rights Advocacy

The applicants and the applicant company were represented by Mr Tumas Arsenovich Misakyan, a lawyer practising in Moscow, and Ms Jessica Gavron, Mr Philip Leach and Ms Kate Levine, lawyers from the European

Luis López Guerra, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   George Nicolaou,   Helen Keller,   Johannes Silvis,   Branko Lubarda,   Pere Pastor Vilanova, judges, and Stephen Phillips

He was represented before the Commission by Mr Philip Leach, a solicitor working for Liberty, London, and by Mr Ben Emmerson and Miss   Helen Mountfield, barristers practising in London.

Mitrtskhulava, lawyers practising in Tbilisi; they were joined later by Mr Jarlath Clifford, Mr Philip Leach, Ms Joanne Sawyer and Ms Jess Gavron, lawyers from the European Human Rights Advocacy Centre