CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Pôle 1 - Chambre 11
6879d5f52db7cac9e5eb495c
17 juillet 2025
DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS L. 742-1 et suivants du Code de l'entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d'asile ORDONNANCE DE TRANSMISSION DE LA QUESTION PRIORITAIRE DE CONSTITUTIONNALITÉ
Page 36 sur 1490
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106DEC004937210
6 novembre 2012
On 30 June 2009 the applicants directly lodged a constitutional complaint in which they attacked the constitutionality of the 1971 Act and all subsequent legislation in that respect.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245595
25 septembre 2025
On 14 November 2019, in the framework of a constitutionality review to which the applicants were not a party, the Constitutional Court annulled section 11(g) of Law no. 4734 for being unforeseeable
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106DEC006003913
6 novembre 2018
He asked the Constitutional Court to annul that injunction. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128DEC006672114
28 novembre 2017
On 17 September 2012 the applicant lodged a petition with the Constitutional Court for the review of the constitutionality and legality (hereinafter “petition for constitutional review”)
ECLI:CEDH:001-212599
21 septembre 2021
Constitutional Court 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1211DEC007161501
11 décembre 2003
On 28 July 2000 the applicant filed a constitutional complaint.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630JUD002580304
30 juin 2009
On 27 September 2002 the Basque autonomous government brought an action before the Constitutional Court challenging the constitutionality of the LOPP, criticising in particular sections 1
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13246
7 mai 2021
of a Constitutional Court judge invalid.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0414DEC002666795
14 avril 1998
The High Court held that the constitutional right to communicate could be regulated by law and that prisoners retained only those constitutionally protected rights which
ECLI:CEDH:001-115901
12 décembre 2012
P., lodged a constitutional complaint against the “material act” of her detention and a constitutional petition for review of constitutionality of Article 49 of the Act on Medical Service and of Articles
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108DEC002020104
8 janvier 2009
Court In its decision of 27 November 2003 (B669/02 Slgnr. 17058) the Constitutional Court examined the constitutionality of the conditions of disenfranchisement under section 22 of the National
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303DEC007586511
3 mars 2020
According to the Constitutional Court’s decision on the constitutionality of Article 13 of the Law on Status of the People’s Deputies of Ukraine, given in June 2008, leaving - or even not joining - a faction
ECLI:CEDH:001-208723
15 février 2021
On 30 August 2000 the Constitutional Court found this statutory restriction constitutional.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0122DEC002419694
22 janvier 1996
as to constitutionality), it was unlikely that a constitutional action about the application of the section in her case would succeed.
ECLI:CEDH:001-171930
6 février 2017
According to the Constitutional Court, the Regional Court’s letter of 12 December 2011 had in fact constituted a decision and the constitutional complaint should have properly been aimed at it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615JUD000771002
15 juin 2010
The Constitutional Court upheld for the most part the constitutionality and legality of the Ordinance.
ECLI:CEDH:001-216087
7 février 2022
According to the Court of Cassation, in particular, there was no reason to refer a new question of the constitutionality of the contested provision, even though the Constitutional Court had decided before
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1209REP002241393
9 décembre 1997
In September 1996 the Administrative Court applied to the Constitutional Court for review of the constitutionality of the provision allowing for the reduction of the applicant's pension claim.
ECLI:CEDH:001-211962
30 août 2021
On 20 October 2015, upon the applicant companies’ applications lodged in June and July 2015, the Constitutional Court examined the constitutionality of section 5 § 2 of the Mass Media Act and Articles