No appeal was lodged against the judgment and it became final ten days later. On 19 January 1999 enforcement proceedings were commenced.

As no appeal was lodged against the judgment, it became final on 3 December 1997.

On 16 February 2005 the Circuit Court upheld the decision of the Garrison Court and it became final. B.

The Commissariat did not appeal against the judgment and on 25   September 2004 it became final. 8.

The judgment of 26 June 2014 became final. 5.

That part of his action had accordingly become time-barred.

If the judgment is not quashed following a cassation appeal, it shall become legally binding when the higher court delivers its decision...” 18.

All sums were to be paid within fifteen days of the date when the decision of the Commercial Court became final. 13.

The five-year limitation period started to run from the date when the decision of the administrative court became final. 32.

This decision became final on 11 October 2002. B.     Relevant domestic law The relevant domestic legislation is described in Radovici and Stănescu   v.

The Court notes that the judgment in favour of the applicants became enforceable on 19 October 2004 and was enforced on 14 September 2005, that is less than eleven months after the judgment had become

Since Slovenia and Croatia became independent in 1991, Croatia has taken the view that it is either the Ljubljana Bank or the Slovenian State which should meet the liabilities owed to customers of the

judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the 22 cases listed in the Appendix to this Resolutions, which were delivered on 10 April 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Willis case delivered on 11   June 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

After the parliamentary elections in 1995 the RP became the leading political party in Turkey and came to power in June 1996 by forming a coalition government with a centre-right party, Dogru Yol.

In July 1995, the appeal court ruled that the prosecution had become time-barred.

The judgment became, in that part, final. The court, however, quashed the trial court’s judgment in respect of the applicant’s compensation claim.

He became entitled to a ‘service pension’ ( szolgálati nyugdíj ) in the amount of 130,000 Hungarian forints [1] . On 28 November 2011 Parliament enacted Act no.

This judgment was upheld in the final instance by the Court of Cassation and became final on 4 November 2009.

4503/06)             JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction – Strike-out)       STRASBOURG   29 May 2012   FINAL   29/08/2012   This judgment has become