The applicant complained that his deprivation of liberty had been unlawful from 26 May 2005 to 15 November 2005.

Even when, strictly speaking, no complaint has been made, an investigation must be started if there are sufficiently clear indications that torture or ill-treatment has been used (see, among other authorities

This rent had been accepted only because the letter requesting that it be reconsidered had been of no avail.

The phone tapping evidence had also been unlawful since no authorisation had ever been included in the case file. 26.

As to the new glasses, they had been given to the applicant as soon as they had been made. 32.

if there had not been a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.

Lastly, the applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that they had been deprived of their land. THE LAW A.

It would have been open to the applicant to lodge an application complaining about the judgment of 26 February 2013. 17.

In the case of Josephides v.

been a violation of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security) of the Convention; by six votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 34 (right of individual petition).

In a Chamber judgment of 4   October 2007 the Court held by five votes to two that there had been a violation of Article   10.

It unanimously found that there had been no violation of Article 13 and that it was not necessary to examine the applicant’s complaint under Article 14 of the Convention.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article   10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

It revealed that one of the police officers mentioned in the first letter   had   previously been   sentenced only to a fine (which he was exempted from paying) and that he had been re-employed

The court rejected his claims on the substance and did not rule on his formal complaint, simply stating that the notice had been “issued lawfully”.

’s freedom of expression had not been “necessary in a democratic society”.

He also complained under Article 7 that he had been given a “criminal record” without ever having been taken before a court. THE LAW A.

  Summary of the facts   These cases both concern, in particular, the excessive length of the proceedings to which the applicants have been parties.