CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123JUD000838920
23 novembre 2023
THE THIRD-PARTY INTERVENERS 14.
Page 37 sur 48
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0202JUD002619813
2 février 2021
That they should abide by the rule of law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1119JUD002417918
19 novembre 2024
The applicant appealed against each decision prolonging her deprivation of liberty, arguing that there was no reasonable suspicion that she had committed the alleged offence and that there were no relevant
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0314DEC007906513
14 mars 2023
They submitted that their next-of-kin had been unlawfully deprived of their liberty and deported to Republika Srpska, where they had been killed.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD005820714
10 juillet 2025
They punched all three applicants in the head and the face. 20. At that point A.M. ran towards the third applicant and held him by the throat against a tree.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD000862009
27 février 2014
At the same time, they stated that there was no evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that State agents had been involved in the incidents. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002582994
9 juin 1998
Case-law and legal theory 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD004031223
23 octobre 2025
According to their account, they met two men, D.C.M. and R.G.S., with whom they drank alcohol.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0407JUD004102319
7 avril 2022
The hospital refuted certain statements contained in D.M.’s expert report, relying on relevant medical theory and practice.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108JUD004716999
8 janvier 2004
Most of the approved bodies were road-traffic cooperatives ( Verkehrsgenossenschaften ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909JUD001373112
9 septembre 2021
The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Vučković and Others
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0319JUD002266210
19 mars 2020
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 50.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607JUD000409912
7 juin 2022
The Government raised two preliminary objections: in the first place, they argued that, had the applicant taken the view that there had been no effective remedy in respect of his complaint
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216DEC005128218
16 février 2021
They sought compensation amounting to 20,000 euros (EUR) each in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage arising from his death. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316JUD008427117
16 mars 2021
They relied on Article 2 of the Convention. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD004838217
21 janvier 2021
253,200 while they had only received EUR 32,984. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0521DEC001040410
21 mai 2013
According to the medical statement, there were reasons to believe that the applicant’s work had caused his problems.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD001922304
30 juillet 2009
The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, inter
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0127DEC000816823
27 janvier 2026
They added, in that connection, that under the theory of functional duality developed by the Constitutional Court in its decision no.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10793
4 décembre 2015
Although there was some dispute over the accessibility of further provisions, the Court noted that they had been published in an official ministerial magazine and could be accessed through an internet