41285/19, § 22, 3 December 2019) that the applicant who had used the said remedies had lost her status as a “victim” within the meaning of Article   34 of the Convention.

  Against this background, the Court considers that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the application. The Court finds no reason to continue the examination of the case.

  Against this background, the Court considers that the applicants have lost interest in pursuing the application. The Court finds no reason to continue the examination of the case.

However, this mistake was not revealed until 2004, after her husband’s death, when the applicant lost her identity card and was issued a new one bearing the corrected version of her name.

It indicates that the applicant has lost interest in the complaint and may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

This privilege requires the reports to be fair and accurate and is only lost if they are published for improper motives or with “reckless indifference” to the truth.

  41285/19, § 22, 3 December 2019) that the applicant who had used the said remedies had lost her status as a “victim” within the meaning of Article   34 of the Convention.

On 22 March 2011, following disciplinary proceedings against the applicant, she permanently lost the right to practice as a bailiff. She received that decision on 5 April 2011.

    On an unspecified date the proceedings were concluded with final and binding effect on the ground that the house in question had burned down and the proceedings had thereby lost their subject-matter

  In the light of the above, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, the Court now considers that the applicant has lost interest in his application.

Moreover, the applicant’s position was not comparable to that of other potential migrants in that she had been born a Dutch national but had lost that nationality involuntarily in 1975 when Suriname became

xa0; The Court considers that the applicant’s failure to inform the Registry about the change of his address despite such explicit obligation highlighted in the Registry’s letters indicate that he has lost

In these circumstances, the Court finds that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the case, as understood by Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, and that there are no general issues concerning

Against this background, the Court considers that the applicants have lost interest in pursuing the application.

Moreover, exclusion from the scheme entailed serious economic consequences for the individual concerned as he or she lost benefits and would only be entitled to receive other unemployment benefits after

Following a reduction in judges’ salaries by 30% in 1999, the applicants instituted proceedings before the domestic courts claiming payment of the lost part of their salaries.

No compensation is available for ex-tobacco-retailers who, by not being awarded a concession, lost part of their livelihood.

The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention that she only became aware of the judgment of 6 May 2008 when the payment order was served on her, by which time she had lost the right

In so far as she complained that her savings had lost their purchasing power due to inflation, there was no general obligation on States to maintain the purchasing power of sums deposited with banks or

As a result, the applicant developed mental-health problems caused by heightened stress and the doctors eventually determined that he had entirely lost the ability to work.