Article 6 § 1, in so far as relevant, reads: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”

All the envelopes bear a stamp that reads: “Censored, date ..., Prosecutor” ( Ocenzurowano, dnia   ... Prokurator ).

Therefore, the statements “VP   1” had made to the Hessian Office of Criminal Investigation were read out in the hearing.

  He alleges a violation of Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1), read together with Article 18 (Art. 18) of the Convention.

Article 1210 reads as follows in the relevant part:   “2. Damages caused by defects of works (services) shall be compensated by the executor of [those works or services].”

That provision reads: “1.

The court held that it was not necessary to read down the 2006 Regulations or 1998 Order to take account of the Convention rights of the McArthurs.

The relevant parts of the invoked provisions read as follows: Article 6 “1.

The relevant part of the judgment reads as follows: “...

SUR LE PREMIER MOYEN : ATTENDU QUE, SELON LES ENONCIATIONS DES JUGES DU FOND, REZAK, ALGERIEN, DEMEURANT EN ALGERIE, ASSURE A LA COMPAGNIE FRANCAISE "LA FONCIERE", A ETE DECLARE RESPONSABLE PAR LA COUR

These Articles read as follows: Article 10 “1.     Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.

    The applicants alleged under Article 11 read in conjunction with Articles 9 and 14 of the Convention that the deregistration and discretionary re-registration of Churches amounted to a violation

The most relevant parts read as follows: “46.     Pluralism is ‘indissociable from a democratic society within the meaning of the Convention.’

Law – Article 11 (read in the light of Article   9): The deregistration of the applicants as churches constituted an interference with their rights under Articles   9 and 11.

s statements before the police and the investigating judge were then read out in Court according to S. 252 para. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

    The relevant Sections of the Law read as follows: Section 3.

    Article 11 of the Convention reads as follows: Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association “1.

Therefore, insofar as a right to marry could be read into the Constitution, it could not be limited to opposite-sex couples.

Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.