CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218737

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2022

4 juillet 2022

    Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his complaint under Article 6 § 1 concerning the unreasonable length of the proceedings under the 2004 Act, as required

Page 39 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC003897206

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2007

15 mai 2007

The first two applicants could have been involved in such cooperation in V.'

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC002560518

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

; and that the accident could have been avoided if the driver of the car had stopped the car after realising that his vision was impaired. 18 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1129JUD003423809

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2016

29 novembre 2016

I have to get up though because I have diarrhoea every morning. I have this big knot. The whole of my left arm is frozen. I feel so sad, deeply sad. I can no longer manage a coffee in the morning.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD001325809

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2014

16 janvier 2014

It is therefore not possible for me to have any views on whether such photos, including close-ups, would have to be regarded in a different light from those featured in the article.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0917JUD006243912

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2020

17 septembre 2020

The police did not have that piece of information on file before the shooting. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0801JUD003377408

Admin. suprême

1 août 2013

1 août 2013

However, the applicant never applied to have it lifted. 38.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD001295111

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

The Court considers that the Government have not convincingly demonstrated that contestation of the attachment decision in civil proceedings would have been capable of preventing the confiscation of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0911DEC002975316

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2018

11 septembre 2018

The court further observed: “Whilst developments since our critical date have been intermittent, they have yielded material which, to put it at its lowest, may cast doubt on the original account.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123JUD006684712

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2017

23 novembre 2017

The defendant and various other persons who have testified before the Court have emphasised that the situation in financial markets was so sensitive during the period related to the case that the slightest

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918JUD000308407

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2012

18 septembre 2012

‘Otherwise I would have killed myself’, says Elaine. It’s difficult to know where to begin in this case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412JUD003480414

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2018

12 avril 2018

Therefore, he could have had no reason to resist his arrest only minutes beforehand.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929DEC007360114

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2020

29 septembre 2020

Therefore, consecutively Article 91 should have been applied, whereas for Article 93 to have been applicable the applicability of Article 91 should have been excluded ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1030JUD001896707

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2014

30 octobre 2014

    If the European Court establishes a procedural violation of the rights of the persons who have taken part in the proceedings, or who have been unjustifiably excluded from such proceedings

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3078109-3421851

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2010

1 avril 2010

Romania (no. 28319/03) The applicant, Alexandru Ştefan, is a Romanian national who was born in 1950 and lives in Giurgiu (Romania).

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-794011-811071

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2003

15 juillet 2003

On 30 November 1995 the SAC upheld the Competition Council’s decision in large part and concluded that Neste should have been fined.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0408JUD007139812

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2015

8 avril 2015

Another 100,000 persons were reported to have fled the fighting to neighbouring countries.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC005781213

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2015

21 avril 2015

Where criminal proceedings have been instituted, a court shall terminate them of its own motion. Where a person concerned by the amnesty ... has been detained, he or she shall be released.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD000193705

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2014

16 octobre 2014

Instead of bringing an ordinary appeal, the applicant lodged a request with the court to have supervisory review proceedings initiated in respect of the detention order. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD001052509

Admin. suprême

7 février 2012

7 février 2012

The Appeal Committee found that the First Instance Committee did not have a lawful composition.

Source officielle