CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218737
4 juillet 2022
Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his complaint under Article 6 § 1 concerning the unreasonable length of the proceedings under the 2004 Act, as required
Page 39 sur 100
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC003897206
15 mai 2007
The first two applicants could have been involved in such cooperation in V.'
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC002560518
28 septembre 2021
; and that the accident could have been avoided if the driver of the car had stopped the car after realising that his vision was impaired. 18 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1129JUD003423809
29 novembre 2016
I have to get up though because I have diarrhoea every morning. I have this big knot. The whole of my left arm is frozen. I feel so sad, deeply sad. I can no longer manage a coffee in the morning.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD001325809
16 janvier 2014
It is therefore not possible for me to have any views on whether such photos, including close-ups, would have to be regarded in a different light from those featured in the article.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0917JUD006243912
17 septembre 2020
The police did not have that piece of information on file before the shooting. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0801JUD003377408
1 août 2013
However, the applicant never applied to have it lifted. 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD001295111
15 janvier 2015
The Court considers that the Government have not convincingly demonstrated that contestation of the attachment decision in civil proceedings would have been capable of preventing the confiscation of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0911DEC002975316
11 septembre 2018
The court further observed: “Whilst developments since our critical date have been intermittent, they have yielded material which, to put it at its lowest, may cast doubt on the original account.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123JUD006684712
23 novembre 2017
The defendant and various other persons who have testified before the Court have emphasised that the situation in financial markets was so sensitive during the period related to the case that the slightest
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918JUD000308407
18 septembre 2012
‘Otherwise I would have killed myself’, says Elaine. It’s difficult to know where to begin in this case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412JUD003480414
12 avril 2018
Therefore, he could have had no reason to resist his arrest only minutes beforehand.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929DEC007360114
29 septembre 2020
Therefore, consecutively Article 91 should have been applied, whereas for Article 93 to have been applicable the applicability of Article 91 should have been excluded ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1030JUD001896707
30 octobre 2014
If the European Court establishes a procedural violation of the rights of the persons who have taken part in the proceedings, or who have been unjustifiably excluded from such proceedings
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3078109-3421851
1 avril 2010
Romania (no. 28319/03) The applicant, Alexandru Ştefan, is a Romanian national who was born in 1950 and lives in Giurgiu (Romania).
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-794011-811071
15 juillet 2003
On 30 November 1995 the SAC upheld the Competition Council’s decision in large part and concluded that Neste should have been fined.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0408JUD007139812
8 avril 2015
Another 100,000 persons were reported to have fled the fighting to neighbouring countries.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC005781213
21 avril 2015
Where criminal proceedings have been instituted, a court shall terminate them of its own motion. Where a person concerned by the amnesty ... has been detained, he or she shall be released.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD000193705
16 octobre 2014
Instead of bringing an ordinary appeal, the applicant lodged a request with the court to have supervisory review proceedings initiated in respect of the detention order. 11.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD001052509
7 février 2012
The Appeal Committee found that the First Instance Committee did not have a lawful composition.