been aware that he had placed the money there. 12.

A balance had not been struck between the interests of the applicants (as owners of the property) and the interests of the public especially since the property lay abandoned.

    The Government submitted that the applicant had not suffered a significant disadvantage, and that all relevant criteria had been satisfied in the present case. 19.

The Commissioner said that the instruction had been sent to him by St   Petersburg human rights activists and that it had been published by the local press.

The Court of Appeal cannot be said to have been biased on the sole ground that it refused to seek a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice.

The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that they had been deprived of their possessions.

The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that she had been deprived of his possessions.

  In its decision of 29 January 1996, the court noted that the decision of 6 October 1995 had been given seventeen days after the expiry of the two months’ time-limit provided for in Article 509t

  In a Chamber judgment delivered on 20 June 2002 the Court held, by six votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

  The facts as submitted by the Government   The Government contested the facts and submitted that Mehmet Ertak had never been taken into police custody.

November 1997 the Lyons Court of Appeal increased the sentence to 12 years on the ground that the applicant had committed the offence while covered by the statutory provisions on recidivism, having been

  Having found the application admissible, the Commission adopted a report on 13 January 1998 in which it expressed the opinion that there had been no violation of Article   10 (thirty-one votes

Having found the applications admissible, the Commission adopted two reports on 11 December 1997 in which it expressed the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 10, considered together with

Having found the application admissible, the Commission adopted a report on 11 December 1997 in which it expressed the opinion that there had been no violation of Article 10 (nineteen votes to thirteen

The judgment has not been enforced to date.

After changing addresses several times in order to evade the jurisdiction of the American courts, to which the case had been referred under the Hague Convention of 25   October 1980 on international

Having found the above complaints admissible, the Commission adopted a report on 13   January 1998 in which it expressed the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 10 (thirty   votes

Having found the application admissible, the Commission adopted a report on 13 January 1998 in which it expressed the opinion that there had been no violation of Article   10 (twenty-three votes to

Furthermore, the first time he had been arbitrarily detained, he had been at a meeting with the Association and 12 of them had been arrested.