of the alleged perpetrator were ineffective and excessively lengthy in breach of the guarantees set out by Article 2 of the Convention.

The police filed criminal complaints against the alleged perpetrators for violent behaviour.

and the alleged absence of an effective investigation in this regard (see Georgia v.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 36.

The four male applicants alleged that the police repeatedly insulted them on account of their ethnic origin.

Furthermore, the applicant Government had submitted a detailed list of alleged victims of the breaches of Article   2, Article   3, Article   5 §   1, Article   8, Article  

prosecutor to reject prosecution of certain offences when the alleged perpetrator agrees to pay a certain amount of money for humanitarian purposes.

On 1 January 2022 the applicant presented herself before the police to denounce the alleged rape and testified as a witness.

The application concerns an alleged violation of the right of access to a court and the right to have the case heard by an impartial tribunal on account of the alleged failure of the Constitutional Court

The main legal problem in the instant cases is the applicants’ inability to access the civil courts in order to request additional compensation for their alleged loss of rental income resulting from the

It further pertains to the alleged failure to inform the applicant of his basic rights prior to those investigative measures (see, mutatis mutandis , Hakan Duman v. Turkey , no.

Concerning the alleged lack of equality of arms, it found that whilst a procedural violation had taken place, no prejudice had resulted from it.

  Alleged unlawful killing of applicant’s brother Reiteration of case-law on Commission’s role in establishment of facts.

Application no. 53848/09 also concerns the use of the evidence obtained under alleged duress during the preliminary investigation stage (see Özcan   Çolak v.

system, alteration of computer data, violation of the secret of correspondence and incitement to hatred and discrimination, and pointed to statements given before the prosecution authorities by the alleged

The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention about his alleged ill-treatment by the police and the alleged ineffectiveness of the domestic investigation in this respect.

The first being alleged breaches of the rules on internal management, the second alleged engagement in unlawful activities.

He alleged that the authorities had not sufficiently justified his detention on remand, in particular that their reliance on the alleged risk of obstruction of the proceedings had been entirely hypothetical

The application concerns the alleged unlawfulness of the applicant’s alleged detention at the Tekirdağ Foreigners’ Removal Centre from 19   October 2017 onwards and his alleged unfitness for detention