Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164547
8 juin 2016
8 juin 2016
IALAMOV against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 28 November 2009 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Alexandru Ialamov, was a Moldovan national who was born in 1986 and lived in Chișinău.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1218DEC000005223
18 décembre 2025
18 décembre 2025
Bacău, Târgu Ocna, Iași and Slobozia Prisons, Rahova and Jilava Prison Hospitals 28/01/2021 pending More than 4 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 27 day(s) 4926/23 01/03/2023 Alexandru
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0918DEC001141903
18 septembre 2006
18 septembre 2006
{ width:201.96pt; display:inline-block } .s9F703587 { width:29.81pt; display:inline-block } .sB9531ABD { width:216.51pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 11419/03 by Aleksandra
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403DEC000414004
3 avril 2012
3 avril 2012
In particular, she was not allowed to have contact with her family for the first thirty days of her detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198861
5 novembre 2019
5 novembre 2019
font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 5 November 2019 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 76328/16 Alexandru
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186358
27 août 2018
27 août 2018
They also complain under Article 13 of the Convention that they do not have any remedies in respect of their complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412DEC002496504
12 avril 2011
12 avril 2011
above application lodged on 22 March 2004, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Alexandru
Source officielleChambre 04
69f44beecdc6046d472f379a
9 avril 2025
9 avril 2025
TOURNIER Alexandre, Commis Greffier En présence de M.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC002409411
2 juin 2015
2 juin 2015
(the applicant) have now reached the following friendly settlement on the basis of respect for human rights, as defined in the... Convention... in order to terminate the proceedings before the...
Source officielleChambre de vacations PC
69eab4d8cdc6046d47516329
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
Silvio DA CONCEICAO SILVA 1 ALLEE DES HARAS 92380 [Localité 2], Président comparant En présence de : SELARL BCM mission conduite par Me [V] [Z] [Adresse 2] administrateur judiciaire de la SASU A.M.C.I
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181067
23 janvier 2018
23 janvier 2018
font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Communicated on 23 January 2018 FIRST SECTION Application nos. 26581/17 and 31024/17 David ODDONE and Alessandro
Source officiellePôle 1 - Chambre 5
65a0f470383a880008fd076b
11 janvier 2024
11 janvier 2024
LA MAISON DE L'IMMOBILIER [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Hada GHEDIR, avocat au barreau de SEINE-SAINT-DENIS, toque : 46 à DEFENDEUR Monsieur [H] [Z] [Adresse 2] [Localité
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929JUD003007503
29 septembre 2020
29 septembre 2020
Some applicants have either not submitted any claims for costs and expenses or have failed to substantiate them.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193290
23 avril 2019
23 avril 2019
Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against them, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180774
20 janvier 2018
20 janvier 2018
On 22 June 2015 the Bucharest County Court upheld the sanction imposed on the applicant, considering that the demonstration should have been authorised beforehand in view of the fact that the gathering
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-247633
18 novembre 2025
18 novembre 2025
Could C redit Suisse ’s premises in the present case have been considered a “forum” for the purposes of Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention, given, as the applicants submit, its status as a bank of systemic
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250178
20 avril 2026
20 avril 2026
14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 May 2026 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 14022/26 Alexandros
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222854
2 janvier 2023
2 janvier 2023
center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 23 January 2023 THIRD SECTION Application no. 49512/22 Panayiotis ALEXANDROU
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0908DEC000689804
8 septembre 2020
8 septembre 2020
Consequently, the applicants cannot claim to have “possessions” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. 13.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709DEC001608215
9 juillet 2020
9 juillet 2020
Furthermore, the applicants have been released from prison.
Source officiellePage 4 sur 100