CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4232

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2004

23 septembre 2004

The judgment became final on 10 September 1998. In the meantime, the applicant had appointed a new lawyer, who in March 1999 requested that the final judgment of the Assize Court be served on him.

Source officielle

Page 4 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155303

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2015

18 mai 2015

or should have become aware that the entry had been made (Article 49).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326DEC005535417

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

    The applicant complained that the judgment in his favour could not become final and that he could not receive the inheritance from his late brother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230008

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2023

6 décembre 2023

The conviction became final on 26 April 2007.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6606

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1999

7 septembre 1999

However, in exceptional circumstances, where an applicant first avails himself or herself of a domestic remedy and only at a later stage becomes aware, or should have become aware, of the circumstances

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2607838-2832318

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2009

15 janvier 2009

The same court’s judgment of 4 December 2003 became final on 15 December 2003 but was not fully enforced until 18 October 2006.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419JUD001194611

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2018

19 avril 2018

    As regards the exact date the offence became time-barred, the applicant initially submitted that the offence became time-barred on 4   September 2010.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1330605-1388301

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2005

1 juin 2005

  In 1993 the applicant became President of the Movement for Social Justice and Equal Rights in Latvia ( Kustība par sociālo taisnīgumu un līdztiesību Latvijā ), which later became a political party

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178160

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2017

25 septembre 2017

  In this connection, when did the national authorities first become aware of the disappearance and, after they became aware of it, what preventive operational measures were taken by those authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187149

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2018

29 septembre 2018

It appears that he and his companions were involved in a fight in a pub with other customers, and when the police arrived, the officers also become involved in the melee and had injuries.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-78111

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Pietiläinen case delivered on 5   November 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56218

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Markass Car Hire Ltd delivered on 2 July 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56352

Admin. suprême

24 février 2004

24 février 2004

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Thieme case delivered on 17   October 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56079

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the P.V. case delivered on 14 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56349

Admin. suprême

24 février 2004

24 février 2004

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Hesse-Anger case delivered on 6 February 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56190

Admin. suprême

24 février 2003

24 février 2003

as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Malveiro case of delivered on 14 March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56131

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2002

21 octobre 2002

as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Mianowicz case delivered on 18 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56128

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2002

21 octobre 2002

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the J.B. case delivered on 26 September 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC002785710

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

The judgment became final and enforceable by 25 November 2000.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-698236-706373

Admin. suprême

11 février 2003

11 février 2003

That judgment became final.

Source officielle