CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4232
23 septembre 2004
The judgment became final on 10 September 1998. In the meantime, the applicant had appointed a new lawyer, who in March 1999 requested that the final judgment of the Assize Court be served on him.
Page 4 sur 1474
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155303
18 mai 2015
or should have become aware that the entry had been made (Article 49).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326DEC005535417
26 mars 2026
The applicant complained that the judgment in his favour could not become final and that he could not receive the inheritance from his late brother.
ECLI:CEDH:001-230008
6 décembre 2023
The conviction became final on 26 April 2007.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6606
7 septembre 1999
However, in exceptional circumstances, where an applicant first avails himself or herself of a domestic remedy and only at a later stage becomes aware, or should have become aware, of the circumstances
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2607838-2832318
15 janvier 2009
The same court’s judgment of 4 December 2003 became final on 15 December 2003 but was not fully enforced until 18 October 2006.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419JUD001194611
19 avril 2018
As regards the exact date the offence became time-barred, the applicant initially submitted that the offence became time-barred on 4 September 2010.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1330605-1388301
1 juin 2005
In 1993 the applicant became President of the Movement for Social Justice and Equal Rights in Latvia ( Kustība par sociālo taisnīgumu un līdztiesību Latvijā ), which later became a political party
ECLI:CEDH:001-178160
25 septembre 2017
In this connection, when did the national authorities first become aware of the disappearance and, after they became aware of it, what preventive operational measures were taken by those authorities
ECLI:CEDH:001-187149
29 septembre 2018
It appears that he and his companions were involved in a fight in a pub with other customers, and when the police arrived, the officers also become involved in the melee and had injuries.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-78111
2 novembre 2006
Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Pietiläinen case delivered on 5 November 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56218
24 avril 2003
Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Markass Car Hire Ltd delivered on 2 July 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56352
24 février 2004
Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Thieme case delivered on 17 October 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56079
30 avril 2002
to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the P.V. case delivered on 14 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56349
Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Hesse-Anger case delivered on 6 February 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56190
24 février 2003
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Malveiro case of delivered on 14 March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56131
21 octobre 2002
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Mianowicz case delivered on 18 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56128
to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the J.B. case delivered on 26 September 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC002785710
30 août 2016
The judgment became final and enforceable by 25 November 2000.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-698236-706373
11 février 2003
That judgment became final.