CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223416
8 février 2023
that he had committed the offence in question or that the elements of this offence had been met in his case; and (ii) violated his right to be presumed innocent because the courts had reversed the burden
Page 4 sur 375
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-244226
20 juin 2025
It found that the applicant had “the burden of proving the absence of an authorisation for R.P. to receive documents on his behalf”.
Chambre Etrangers/HSC
6881beb953f7f060d28c78cb
23 juillet 2025
D'APPEL DE RENNES N° 25/144 N° RG 25/00515 - N° Portalis DBVL-V-B7J-WBKR JURIDICTION DU PREMIER PRÉSIDENT O R D O N N A N C E article L 3211-12-4 du code de la santé publique Aude BURESI
TRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:2015:225
23 avril 2015
competition — Constitution of a reserve pool of Administrators (AD 5) of Bulgarian and Romanian citizenship in the field of law — Selection board’s decision not to include the appellant on the reserve list — Burden
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4774
17 juillet 2003
However, this system of monitoring correspondence entails the risk of imposing an excessive burden on the bankrupt as regards his right to respect for his correspondence, owing in particular to the length
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0702JUD004183811
2 juillet 2013
The overall tax burden should moreover not run counter to the principle of equality demanding the division of burden depending on the contributing capacity (BVerfG, 2 BvL 37/91, 22.6.1995
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2025:139
6 mars 2025
confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden
ECLI:CEDH:001-209949
12 avril 2021
Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicant company complains that the amount of tax and penalties that it was ordered to pay amounted to an excessive individual burden which
ECLI:CEDH:001-178157
26 septembre 2017
§ 2 of the Convention, which requires that when carrying out their duties, the members of a court should not start with the preconceived idea that the accused has committed the offence charged; the burden
ECLI:CEDH:001-214570
1 décembre 2021
In particular, she claims that the law introducing extended forfeiture was not foreseeable and imposed a disproportionate burden on her.
ECLI:CEDH:001-228698
3 octobre 2023
(ii) did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company (see Intersplav v. Ukraine , no. 803/02, § 40, 9 January 2007, and Buffalo S.r.l. in liquidation v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-224905
24 avril 2023
1 in that the domestic courts dismissing his actions interpreted the relevant legal provisions too broadly, placing a disproportionate burden on him as the owner of the hostel from which he could
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625JUD004957011
25 juin 2013
ECLI:CEDH:001-175352
15 juin 2017
Did the Sincan Civil Court of First Instance impose the burden of submitting evidence as regards the proceeds of the servitude area on the applicant alone, without seeking any expert opinion in that regard
ECLI:CEDH:001-176230
17 juillet 2017
ECLI:CEDH:001-201627
3 février 2020
In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)? 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0408DEC001388102
8 avril 2003
He rejected the applicant’s argument that the proceedings reversed the burden of proof and thus breached Article 6 § 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128DEC003664214
28 novembre 2017
The various payroll burdens, including the special tax, amounted to HUF 4,225,048 (approximately EUR 13,600). The overall tax burden on the applicant’s annual revenue was thus about 34%. 9 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC005296914
16 janvier 2018
The overall tax burden on Mr Legeza’s severance payment was 69.7%. 8. In application no. 6248/15 ( Holló v.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1699627-1781480
16 juin 2006
They were therefore awarded compensation only for non-pecuniary damage and disruption to their lives, and not for the special burdens arising from their child’s disability.