, the Court is of the view that he cannot be reproached from the perspective of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention for not awaiting the outcome of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court (see Furman

  the   Czech Republic , nos. 4824/06 and 15512/08, § 48, 22   April   2010; Bergmann v. the Czech Republic, no. 8857/08, § 45, 27   October   2011; Furman v.

  Furmann, a lawyer practising in Miskolc, who also assists “the Legal Defence Bureau for National and Ethnic Minorities” (hereafter the “NEKI”).

   Following a moratorium consequent upon a decision of the United States Supreme Court (Furman v.

provide the Court with any example of a decision demonstrating the alleged viability and effectivity of the remedy to be used in order to expedite proceedings (compare Bergmann , cited above, § 49, and Furman

bring a complaint under Article 6 in his or her personal capacity, having acknowledged a close connection between the applicant’s personality as an individual and a company owner (see, for example, Furman

Antonio FERSINI 1950 Virgilio FIAONI 1967 Tommaso FILOGRANO 1953 Antenore FONTANA 1951 Claudio FRACASSINI 1955 Domenico FRISINA 1973 Nicola FRISINA 1978 Giampaolo FRISO 1962 Ettore FU BIAGIO 1969 Nicola FUMAI

1976 Robanestii de Jos   Ion ISPAS 10/07/1972 Pielesti   Stefan POROJNICU 28/02/1971 Carcea   Marin FLOREA 09/04/1959 Robanesti   Marian DUMITRU 18/08/1974 Robanesti   Viorel FURMA