CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

69 résultats pour « Stéphanie WONG YEN »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD005075706

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2013

18 juillet 2013

Zupančič,   André Potocki,   Paul Lemmens,   Helena Jäderblom,   Dmitry Dedov, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 June 2013,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331JUD003818797

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2005

31 mars 2005

    The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Lord Lester of Herne Hill, QC, assisted by Ms Monica Carss-Frisk, QC, and Mr   Stephen Grosz, counsel from Bindman &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303JUD004619207

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2020

3 mars 2020

The inquiry had been pending by the time of submission of their observations (11   June 2013), and the final domestic decision had not been taken yet. 53.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0907JUD004362716

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2023

7 septembre 2023

Journalist: “I wonder why the prosecution service failed to achieve a guilty verdict. Did the prosecution case lack something that led the jury to deliver such a decision regarding Okropiridze?”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1208JUD002539709

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2020

8 décembre 2020

The results indicated that the ruling Communist Party of Moldova had narrowly won the elections. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319JUD004362414

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2019

19 mars 2019

The inheritance case, which the applicant won both at first and second instance (in 2012 and 2014 respectively), was covered extensively in the above publications. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0119JUD002694709

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2021

19 janvier 2021

According to the published results, the ruling Communist Party of Moldova narrowly won the elections. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607JUD004459216

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2022

7 juin 2022

According to these results, the ruling Communist Party of Moldova had narrowly won the elections. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1206REP001813991

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 1993

6 décembre 1993

  Some people again, who have not       really considered the matter very carefully, wonder about that,       and they say juries should be given

Source officielle

Page 4 sur 4

← Précédent