CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

71 résultats pour « Steeve RUBEN »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1022JUD003944616

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2024

22 octobre 2024

  56066/22), Olga Churakova, Yuliya Apukhtina, Roman Badanin, Sofya Groysman, Yuliya Lukyanova, Mikhail Rubin, Daniil Sotnikov and Mariya Zheleznova (no.

Source officielle

Page 4 sur 4

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD004406807

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2011

20 décembre 2011

sufficiently precise to allow the person – if need be, with appropriate advice – to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Steel

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0207JUD005571200

Admin. suprême

7 février 2008

7 février 2008

    The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 4 also guarantees the right to a speedy judicial decision concerning the lawfulness of detention (see Rutten   v. the Netherlands , no. 32605/96

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0908REP002778395

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 1999

8 septembre 1999

Consequently, the proceedings were stayed (Ruhen des Verfahrens). So far, none of the parties has requested their continuation.   B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0119JUD001213808

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2016

19 janvier 2016

The Court does not consider the present case as a whistle-blower case (see, for instance, Rubins v.   Latvia , no.   79040/12, § 87, 13 January 2015).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1108JUD001552610

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2011

8 novembre 2011

Such injuries are typically caused by dragging an object sideways along the surface of the skin or by blows from the side, but the conclusion that they were caused by being rubbed against an obstacle or

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0903JUD003445910

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2015

3 septembre 2015

court, the applicant’s sisters R. and K. and the H. foundation had informed the court that they had agreed on a settlement of the case and requested that the proceedings be stayed perpetually ( ewiges Ruhen

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0618JUD005873714

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2024

18 juin 2024

The applicant had been suffering from anxiety and fear, and had rubbed her hands together and cried when speaking about what had happened.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0701JUD004299808

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2010

1 juillet 2010

in keeping with the purpose of protecting the individual from arbitrariness (see, inter alia , Erkalo v. the Netherlands , 2 September 1998, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ VI; Steel

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0623JUD005946108

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2011

23 juin 2011

question the ambulance doctors, to analyse the anonymous letter received by the applicants with a view to establishing its author, to question T. as to whether he had suffered any injuries, and to take steps

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD000377217

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2025

13 novembre 2025

dated 27 November 2014, the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice informed the trial court that the Court’s judgment had become final on the date of its delivery, and described what steps

Source officielle