CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1014JUD001901718
14 octobre 2025
These courts made no findings about any partial sale of the property by the applicants’ ancestors. 22.
Page 4 sur 7
Cour d'Appel
6253c9eebd3db21cbdd89990
20 novembre 2007
2007 DÉCISION DÉFÉRÉE : Jugement du CONSEIL DE PRUD'HOMMES DE ROUEN du 27 Novembre 2006 APPELANT : Monsieur Didier X... ... 76160 ST MARTIN DU VIVIER représenté par Me Susana
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC002181003
27 mars 2008
The explosive devices had been home-made and probably radio-controlled.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD000907407
18 octobre 2011
In the Government’s view, any claim for work carried out after 22 January 2000 should be dismissed as male fide .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD005716608
12 octobre 2017
: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0823DEC003930711
23 août 2016
She also considered that she had been made to bear an excessive individual burden as a construction investor. 13.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1216DEC000246820
16 décembre 2020
the same matter that is lawfully available, apply to the Civil Court, First Hall, for redress. (2) The Civil Court, First Hall, shall have original jurisdiction to hear and determine any application made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0407JUD003238211
7 avril 2016
The applicants made the same submissions as those summarised in this Court’s judgment in the case of Sharra and Others , cited above, §§ 57 ‑ 58.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0628DEC002702303
28 juin 2005
A request for reconsideration shall not be made currently with an appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD004713707
3 octobre 2013
Where no complaint is made by the victim, a public-private criminal prosecution may be initiated by the prosecutor only in the following cases: 37.5.2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD004270710
7 février 2017
On 29 May 2006 the next enforcement attempt was made. The respondent again failed to appear. According to his representative, he had not been properly summoned.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221867
21 novembre 2022
Constitutional Court had recognised the existence of overriding reasons relating to the public interest which justified retrospective application of the contested law and had established that the power to make
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0420JUD001505602
20 avril 2006
lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a national of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Ms Suzana
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-245583
22 septembre 2025
Italie Marco ABBONIZIO 1980 Francavilla Al Mare Giuseppe ACETO 1977 Chieti Vincenzo ADDONISIO 1961 Ferrara Antonio AIELLI 1976 Folignano Vanessa ALESIANI 1986 Ascoli Piceno Giovanni ALMA 1978 Misterbianco
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1024JUD000782107
24 octobre 2013
The group then went to the applicant’s house and checked the passports of all the males present.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701DEC004235004
1 juillet 2014
THE LAW After the failure of attempts to reach a friendly settlement, by a letter of 22 June 2012 and the corrigendum of 31 August 2012 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0611DEC004610615
11 juin 2024
Furthermore, the applicants had not made use of the remedy under Article 349 of the Civil Code, nor the remedies under the 2015 Property Act. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422DEC007160717
22 avril 2021
The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0530DEC005905419
30 mai 2023
PASSARELLI BINI 2018 italienne, américaine Susanna LOLLINI En 2009, les deux premiers requérants se marièrent en Espagne.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217DEC005989311
17 décembre 2013
After unsuccessful friendly settlement negotiations, by letter dated 9 September 2013 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a declaration with a view to resolving the issues