CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10418
5 mars 2015
As a result, the domestic law did not meet the requirements of the quality of law for the purpose of the Convention.
Page 4 sur 115
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159650
3 décembre 2015
It is not clear whether he was in fact admitted to that latter hospital. It appears that the execution of his sentence of imprisonment was then suspended. 7.
ECLI:CEDH:001-115424
20 novembre 2012
Burugă, a lawyer practising in Timişoara. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD000441415
6 mars 2025
By the time her lawyer found out about the service of the decision and was able to lodge an appeal on points of law, the relevant time-limit had already expired. 19.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704DEC004421411
4 juillet 2017
A week later the applicant’s lawyer complained to the head of the detention facility that she was not receiving treatment for diabetes, although her health had worsened significantly.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC005861613
25 avril 2017
THE LAW 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614DEC000672116
14 juin 2022
Furthermore, the time-limit was not unforeseeable for the applicant, who was represented by a lawyer the entire time.
ECLI:CEDH:001-208742
19 février 2021
In particular, was he provided with all the material evidence used against him in a timely manner? 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC000733210
20 septembre 2011
At the same time he applied for a lawyer to be appointed to act on his behalf and for a waiver of the court fees.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0430JUD006633809
30 avril 2015
The decision stated, inter alia , that the applicant had confessed to the 1998 crime but had later asserted his innocence on the advice of lawyer O. Kh.
ECLI:CEDH:001-228041
12 septembre 2023
Vuchetich, both lawyers practising in Zagreb with the law firm Batarelo Dvojković Vuchetich. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant company, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13143
16 février 2021
They later appealed unsuccessfully.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2459
25 octobre 2007
He died a year later.
ECLI:CEDH:001-140162
18 décembre 2013
Appeal on points of law 20.
ECLI:CEDH:001-114632
16 octobre 2012
Relevant domestic law and practice 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD005281908
20 octobre 2016
Later on 21 July 2007 the applicant was questioned as a criminal suspect. The questioning took place in the presence of a lawyer appointed for him.
ECLI:CEDH:001-138869
7 novembre 2013
law and practice below).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510DEC003000903
10 mai 2007
At the Üsküdar Law and Order Department, the applicant was insulted and threatened by the chief police officer, R.A, who later ordered other officers to torture him.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12556
11 juillet 2019
to conduct the appeal proceedings in a timely manner in order to ensure that, should an appellant be successful, he or she would have sufficient time before election day to conduct his or her campaign
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC003000609
The hearing was adjourned to give the lawyer time to study the case file. 16 .