CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC001920813

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2016

13 décembre 2016

By the same judgment, which became final ten days later, the court granted similar claims by several other ex-employees of the company.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68408-68876

Admin. suprême

6 février 2001

6 février 2001

If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1007DEC000574817

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2021

7 octobre 2021

However, special considerations may apply in exceptional cases in which an applicant avails himself of, or relies on, an apparently existing remedy and only subsequently becomes aware of circumstances

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0222DEC003164617

Admin. suprême

22 février 2022

22 février 2022

  71667/17, 10   December 2019) the Court found that in 2019 a constitutional complaint had become an effective domestic remedy for complaints concerning ineffective investigations under Articles

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3350

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

On 5 July 1979 he became eligible for parole after a “probationary period” of 15 years.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2807157-3074091

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2009

21 juillet 2009

On 9   October 1978 seven young left-wing extremists were killed in a flat in Ankara, in what became known as the “Bahçelievler massacre”, believed to have been organised by a secret nationalist group

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2143987-2281798

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2007

11 octobre 2007

Immediately after the operation she complained of severe chest pains, her breasts became swollen and she had difficulty moving her arms.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD001753403

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2009

13 octobre 2009

    On 19 November 2004 the judgment of 11 November 2004 became final since it was not appealed by the parties. THE LAW I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-72667

Admin. suprême

22 février 2006

22 février 2006

#xa0; September   2004 and 30   November   2004 in the 3 cases details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9577

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2014

16 juillet 2014

Investbanka became an independent bank with headquarters in Serbia and branches, including the Tuzla branch, in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12912

Admin. suprême

28 juillet 2020

28 juillet 2020

In 2004, when he was 17, the applicant became aware that he did not have Dutch nationality and was staying in the Netherlands unlawfully. He applied unsuccessfully for a residence permit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208382

Admin. suprême

5 février 2021

5 février 2021

After his release in late 2013, the first applicant became pregnant and went to live with G.S.’s parents. From that time G.S. has been abusing her verbally and physically. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC000741615

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

The judgment became final on 22 July 2007. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0426JUD000288104

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2007

26 avril 2007

    In 1986 a valuation schedule ( Bewertungsplan ) was issued, which became final in October of that year.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD002675903

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2008

4 décembre 2008

    On 4 December 2002 the Rostov Regional Court upheld the judgment on appeal and it became enforceable. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD000210907

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

In October and December 2004 the Pervomayskiy District Court of Krasnodar (“the District Court”) held for the applicants, the judgments became binding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0512JUD000573003

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2010

12 mai 2010

On 4 August 1998 this judgment became binding but was not enforced immediately, and the applicant resubmitted his claim. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114364

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2012

8 octobre 2012

That decision was not appealed and thus became final. (b)     Investigation concerning the alleged fraud 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112DEC002161013

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

The applicants should have become aware in 2003 that there had been no further progress in the investigation. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-119589

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2013

16 avril 2013

This judgment was upheld by the Serbian Supreme Military Court on 29   December 1992 and thus became final. 2.

Source officielle

Page 40 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →