CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD002833807
4 septembre 2018
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 29.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD003828815
20 septembre 2022
Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficent (Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1122JUD001829713
22 novembre 2018
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (C) OF THE CONVENTION 21.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD001608806
13 février 2018
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917JUD007546010
17 septembre 2019
    ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0607JUD003513208
7 juin 2018
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 42.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD002434417
7 décembre 2021
    Relying on Article 6   §§   1 and 3 (c) and (d) of the Convention, the applicant complained about his removal from the courtroom.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD005414609
12 janvier 2017
They relied on Article   6 §§ 1 and 3 d) of the Convention:   “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD003465304
26 juin 2012
    The applicant complained that he had been unable to participate in the appeal hearing held on 19   February 2004 in contravention of Article 6   §   3   (c) of the Convention
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10998
26 avril 2016
Estonia - 22574/08 Judgment 26.4.2016 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Court of Appeal’s decision to overturn acquittal on the basis of its own assessment of the record
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD005833109
10 juillet 2012
    Since the requirements of Article 6 § 3 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1, the Court will in this case examine the complaints under
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD002257408
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD002718708
14 novembre 2023
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 ( c ) OF THE CONVENTION 29.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD000915410
15 décembre 2015
6 §   1 combiné avec l’article 6 §   3 d) de la Convention. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD006636211
17 décembre 2020
He relied on Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention, which reads as follows: “1.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9415
4 mars 2014
Judgment 4.3.2014 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Absence of public hearing before financial markets regulator empowered to impose heavy penalties: Article 6 § 1
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308JUD003477909
8 mars 2018
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 OF THE CONVENTION 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD002045817
13 juillet 2021
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 19.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7422
19 février 2013
Spain - 61800/08 Judgment 19.2.2013 [Section III] Article 6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Admission in evidence of statement by sole prosecution witness who could not be cross-examined because
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD000714806
27 février 2018
Page 40 sur 58499
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.