On 10 March 2003 Batasuna requested that a preliminary question on the constitutionality of the LOPP be submitted to the Constitutional Court, since it considered that certain sections of the LOPP

On 18 February 1998 the First Division of the Federal Constitutional Court dismissed two of the constitutional appeals lodged during 1986.

On 26   December 2011 the Constitutional Court of Ukraine had found these changes to be constitutional.

The applicant then attempted to dispute the constitutionality of the Regulation in the Constitutional Court.

In dismissing the applicant’s constitutional complaint, the Constitutional Court gave a detailed decision why it considered that sexual relations between siblings could adversely affect the family structure

que la déclaration d'inconstitutionnalité et l'abrogation de l'article 222-32 du code pénal que ne manquera pas de prononcer le Conseil constitutionnel à la suite de la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité

    On 13 March 2014 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint under section 27 of the Constitutional Court Act (see Mendrei v.

    Constitutional redress proceedings 16.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Constitutional proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms)

The applicant lodged a constitutional appeal on 7 October 2015, which was dismissed by the Constitutional Court ( Ústavní soud ) on 10 May 2016, referring to the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

1958, ONT AINSI ETE IMPLICITEMENT MAIS NECESSAIREMENT ABROGES PAR CE TEXTE QUI, CONFORMEMENT A SON ARTICLE 62, S'IMPOSE DIRECTEMENT AU JUGE SANS QUE CETTE CONSTATATION IMPLIQUE UN CONTROLE DE CONSTITUTIONNALITE

On 23 December 1998 the Constitutional Court rejected four petitions for (abstract) constitutional review and thus refused to institute proceedings to review the constitutionality of the Transfer Act.

fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Civil proceedings;Constitutional proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)

On 22 November 1993 the Constitutional Court informed the applicant that his constitutional complaint had been registered.

    On 2 November 2010 the Constitutional Court rejected the applicant’s constitutional appeal as inadmissible. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 12.

The court accordingly, decided to stay its decision on the second charge until the Constitutional Court had ruled on the constitutionality of Article 380.

    On 13 September 2011 the Constitutional Court rejected the constitutional appeal as inadmissible. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 10.

        The competence of the Constitutional Court to receive complaints about the violation of constitutionally guaranteed rights is laid down in S. 144 para. 1 of the Federal

of the constitutionality and legality of Article   3   of the State of Emergency Decree (see paragraph   25 above) and its compliance with the constitutional right to liberty and security