This decision became final on 2 June 2006. 13.     On 28 June 2006 the customs authority invited the applicant to recover the laptop. 14.

As regards measures and other types of interference, this period commences when the complainant has had a   practical opportunity to become aware of them. 18.

VIRON BEZHANI against Albania lodged on 16 February 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the non-enforcement of the Sports Arbitration Commission’s decision of 2 April 2009, which became

As a result of the aforementioned prison conditions he became ill with tuberculosis while he was detained in Tulcea Prison.

They only subsequently became aware that they had become aliens, when, for example, they attempted to renew their personal documents (personal identification card, passport, driving licence).

No appeals were lodged and this judgment became final on 30 August 2008. 12.

This judgment became final on 23 May 2003. 7.

This judgment became final. 7.     According to the Government, the applicant never submitted the enforcement writ in respect of this judgment for enforcement. 8.

final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the judgments of the Court became final between 14   February   2001 and 15   May   2005 and transmitted to

This decision became final on 19 April 1998. THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 12.

#xa0; (Application no. 6552/02)     JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   1 June 2006       FINAL     01/09/2006       This judgment will become

The applicants’ fourth son, Mr   Akon Sapondzhyan, has also become a resident of Russia. 11.

The judgment was not appealed against and became final within the statutory ten-day time-limit. 7.

The divorce judgment became final on 28   June 2005. 2.

    On 9 July 2003 the Kyiv City Court of Appeal upheld this judgment and it became final. 9.

This decision became final on 2 February 1997. THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 16.

This judgment became final. The transfer to W.K. and apparently also to the applicant was effectuated on 11 May 1999.

. 17038/04)             JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction)     STRASBOURG   12 July 2011     FINAL   12/10/2011     This judgment has become

  These previous findings, so the Regional Court pointed out, had become binding in that the Federal Court confirmed the applicant's conviction of breach of trust.

If the request in a civil case is based on the circumstance referred to in section 7, subsection (4), the period shall be calculated from when the judgment became final.