CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0206JUD000268912
6 février 2014
Passages throughout the correctional facility grounds had been separated by barriers approximately 20   cm high.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0107JUD002236510
7 janvier 2020
When he started receiving parcels from relatives, he asked them to send him cigarettes, which he then exchanged with the guards for normal drinking water. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0217JUD003378004
17 février 2011
    On 7 April 2010 the applicant's representative sent a parcel to the applicant enclosing a letter and human rights booklets.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630JUD004672099
30 juin 2005
The land became part of a pool of State-owned land ( Staatlicher Bodenfond ) from which parcels of land averaging eight hectares in area were redistributed to farmers who had little or no land of their
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1008JUD001066405
8 octobre 2009
The detainees can buy additional food and other items through the centre; they are also allowed to receive parcels, send and receive letters and use the telephone.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1212JUD005654521
12 décembre 2024
His complaint concerns in particular the extent of his confinement to his cell (in relation to the limited amount of the time that he had been able to spend out of his cell and any activities that had
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0510JUD007877413
10 mai 2016
Article 90 allows ill or disabled inmates to receive additional parcels or packages, including ones containing medication, the content and quantity of which must be determined by medical specialists.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD004355310
16 octobre 2014
    The Government acknowledged that the applicant’s expulsion would amount to an interference with his right to respect for his family life.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD002876606
26 juin 2018
    On 13 September 2005 the first applicant made its own assessment of the communal charges in the amount of 131,324.65 euros (EUR) and made the payment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0429JUD003904297
29 avril 2003
In particular, prisoners were allowed to have eight hours of sleep during the night; they could receive six parcels and three small packets per year, buy food and toiletries in the prison shop (up to the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0112JUD002572502
12 janvier 2012
He considered that he had been detained as a convicted person, referring to a number of parcels he had been allowed to receive. 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD003958305
24 avril 2014
Once when a parcel from home arrived for me, I decided to share it with Brovkin R., Kosarev A. and Prudnikov Ye. so that they would not touch me.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0423JUD005262410
23 avril 2013
at least once a month. (2) The pre-trial detainee’s right of correspondence and right to receive visitors and parcels may – except for contact with his defence counsel – be limited in the interests of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1031JUD002161316
31 octobre 2019
    The Government also explained that the applicant had been given the possibility of receiving parcels and visits while in prison.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD001815605
27 mai 2010
    On 14 March 2006 the applicant received by parcel two decisions of the Batumi City Court dated 30 September and 27 October 2005.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC000652403
13 mai 2014
property with respect to the same immovable; the annulment of the title to property in the lack of any compensation; the issue of a final decision confirming the right to compensation without fixing the amount
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD000058813
22 février 2018
    The applicant was represented by Mr Pascal Bibard, a lawyer practising in Amiens.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828JUD000020307
28 août 2018
    According to the Court’s settled case-law, the State’s obligations in relation to Article   8 are not of result but are of means (see Pascal v.   Romania , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1202JUD005312999
2 décembre 2003
    However, the Court considers that, with the passage of time, this ground inevitably became less relevant, in particular in view of the fact that the applicant's two accomplices were arrested
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1693027-1787437
15 juin 2006
was true that appeals could be made against those decisions to the higher levels of the Prosecutor’s Office, they were the hierarchical superiors of the Sofia City Prosecutor’s Office and part and parcel
Page 41 sur 47
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.