that the outstanding judgments remained unenforced on account of the existence of an objective impossibility thereto, in particular in view of the fact that the debtors, private parties, either did not have

However, the court was not provided with any objective information which could have confirmed that the company Concept’s registration of its title to the ship had been unlawful ...

In case of any criminal charge brought against him, the suspect, defendant or accused shall have the following rights ... - to question witnesses for the prosecution or to have them questioned and to have

law all companies had to have a director.

The court therefore held that it did not have jurisdiction to examine the application.

polypectomy, that the diagnoses may have been made in haste and that there may have been negligence and carelessness in the medical treatment administered to her husband.

Such a complaint could have led to the institution of disciplinary proceedings.

the session or have proposed that a trial be held before the appellate court, shall be notified of the session.

The applicant was found to have acted in self-defence and the investigator’s decision, characterising the police officers’ actions as lawful, was found to have been unfounded (see paragraph 18 above).

This is unacceptable ... because it would have led to a situation where a party to judicial proceedings which considers that it has been a victim of unlawful actions by a judge would have recourse not

Article 117 § 3 “Public or private forests or forest areas which have been destroyed or are being destroyed by fire or have otherwise been deforested or are being deforested, shall not thereby relinquish

inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .fixListIndent { list-style-position: inside }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40068/19 Şerban Alexandru

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

Greece, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,

In particular, the Government noted that the applicant should have lodged a criminal complaint with the prosecution authorities or should have complained to the investigator during the criminal investigation

    The hearing of 28 March 2001 was postponed following an application by the applicant to have his claims amended. 11.

A summons or another form of notification shall be served on parties in such a way [as to ensure] that they have enough time to prepare their case and to appear at the hearing. 4.