The police discovered in the flat drugs, foreign currency and a number of forged passports. On 11 November 1989 RH was also arrested in H's flat.

In September 2007 the applicants received instructions from the sanitary inspectorate that the water in their flats had been contaminated with mineral oils and that it should not be used for any other

  The applicants submitted that in February 1993 the police had gone into their flats and emptied them of their contents.

    The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about her prolonged inability to recover possession of her flat through lack of police assistance. 4.

    By a supplementary decision of 12 September 1986, based on section   100 of the TUPA, the mayor determined the exact location, size and other details in respect of the future flat to

       So far, the applicant has not recovered possession of his flat.

However, her former husband did not allow the applicant to enter the flat. She was therefore obliged to temporarily stay at different places including her sister’s flat. 7.

After the divorce, all the family members and O.L. remained living in the same flat. 18.

When drawing up the lease agreement, the tenant is obliged to make a   notarised declaration agreeing to a voluntary vacation of the rented flat on termination of the lease and must indicate a flat

On 18 May 1993 the aunt concluded a contract with the cooperative, privatising the flat, and had it certified by a notary.

He considered that paragraph 4 of the additional provisions of the Act entitled him to buy the flat at a preferential price.

    On the same day a search was carried out in the applicant’s flat without a court order.

In the morning of 26 February 2009 masked police officers broke into the applicant’s flat and took him away. During the next hours he was severely ill-treated.

    Background to the case The applicants are owners of apartment No. 1 San Michel Flats, St.   George’s Street, St.

On 16 July 2020 a search was carried out in the applicant’s flat, allegedly without a search warrant issued by a court or a decision by an investigator.

    In a supplementary decision of 19 February 1979, based on section   100 of the TUPA, the mayor specified the exact location, size and other details in respect of the flat to be provided

The applicant had been confined to his flat; he had been under strict surveillance and worn an electronic tracking device; he had not been allowed to leave his flat, even to take walks.

During that congress, certain persons wearing masks took down a Turkish flag in the hall and replaced it by a PKK flag and a poster of Abdullah Öcalan.

In his defence the applicant explained that the money he had been carrying corresponded to the sale price of a flat in Podgorica (Montenegro) he had bought from a Croatian national, a certain S.K., who

    She is the owner of a flat in Milan, which she had let to W.V. 8.