CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

830 résultats pour « Kuilan »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708JUD003303804

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2014

8 juillet 2014

Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §   38, 28   April   2004, and Kudla v. Poland [GC] no. 30210/96, §   152, ECHR   2000-XI). 90.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917DEC002929522

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2024

17 septembre 2024

According to data held by Estonian National Archives, L.A. was born in 1885 in the village of Livonia in Kuban Oblast and lived there at the time she applied for citizenship.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308JUD001722904

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2011

8 mars 2011

of proceedings complaint is whether or not the applicant was afforded an opportunity to have the proceedings expedited or had a possibility to claim compensation for delays which have occurred (see Kudla

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011JUD003404596

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2001

11 octobre 2001

Belgium judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11 pp. 13-14, § 25, and Kudla v. Poland (GC), no. 30210/96, § 122, ECHR 2000-XI; see also García Manibardo v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC000787714

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2016

14 juin 2016

In Kudla v Poland (judgment of the Grand Chamber, 26 October 2000, application no. 30210/96) the ECtHR has expressed the view that the domestic remedy that is available to the applicant for protection

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0730JUD003138617

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2020

30 juillet 2020

In Kudla v. Poland (judgment of the Grand Chamber, 26 October 2000, application no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0509JUD004786399

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2003

9 mai 2003

13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an “arguable complaint” under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see, among many other authorities, Kudla

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-168336

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2016

10 octobre 2016

By the spring of 1970 the High Commissioner in Kuala Lumpur and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (“FCO”) were expressing concern about “political difficulties” and the risk that the investigation could

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0724JUD004146102

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2008

24 juillet 2008

for his human dignity and that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention (see Kudla

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD004408298

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2005

9 juin 2005

It has deemed treatment to be “degrading” because it was such as to arouse in the victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them (see Kudla v.

Source officielle

Page 42 sur 42

← Précédent