CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708JUD003303804
8 juillet 2014
Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §   38, 28   April   2004, and Kudla v. Poland [GC] no. 30210/96, §   152, ECHR   2000-XI). 90.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917DEC002929522
17 septembre 2024
According to data held by Estonian National Archives, L.A. was born in 1885 in the village of Livonia in Kuban Oblast and lived there at the time she applied for citizenship.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308JUD001722904
8 mars 2011
of proceedings complaint is whether or not the applicant was afforded an opportunity to have the proceedings expedited or had a possibility to claim compensation for delays which have occurred (see Kudla
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011JUD003404596
11 octobre 2001
Belgium judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11 pp. 13-14, § 25, and Kudla v. Poland (GC), no. 30210/96, § 122, ECHR 2000-XI; see also García Manibardo v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC000787714
14 juin 2016
In Kudla v Poland (judgment of the Grand Chamber, 26 October 2000, application no. 30210/96) the ECtHR has expressed the view that the domestic remedy that is available to the applicant for protection
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0730JUD003138617
30 juillet 2020
In Kudla v. Poland (judgment of the Grand Chamber, 26 October 2000, application no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0509JUD004786399
9 mai 2003
13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an “arguable complaint” under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see, among many other authorities, Kudla
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-168336
10 octobre 2016
By the spring of 1970 the High Commissioner in Kuala Lumpur and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (“FCO”) were expressing concern about “political difficulties” and the risk that the investigation could
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0724JUD004146102
24 juillet 2008
for his human dignity and that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject him to distress or hardship exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention (see Kudla
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD004408298
9 juin 2005
It has deemed treatment to be “degrading” because it was such as to arouse in the victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them (see Kudla v.
Page 42 sur 42