CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10341
20 janvier 2015
Moreover, in view of the lengthy delay which had already occurred, a more appropriate enforcement interval should be introduced, such as that initially adopted in 2012.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245890
7 octobre 2025
(i) did not reflect the entire period it had been occupied by the authorities, and (ii) was calculated using the criteria set out in Article 42 bis of Presidential Decree no. 327/2001 instead of the more
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1125JUD001272887
25 novembre 1992
For compelling reasons, which are to be mentioned in the official record, it can decide on a longer period, but in no case more than three months. 3. ..."
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207JUD001720204
7 décembre 2010
and that the question of the causes of certain diseases has to be discussed more thoroughly.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0422JUD004887608
22 avril 2013
This is not an area which more readily falls into the sphere in which judges are more experienced and expert. This is the more true of non-national judges.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0704JUD005945000
4 juillet 2006
A proposal dated 17 April 1996 mentioned a “precautionary or security measure required for one or more of the following reasons: need to prevent communication with one or more other prisoners”. 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD000640621
20 février 2024
Under Article 11 § 5, a serious crime ( sunkus nusikaltimas ) is an intentional crime for which the maximum penalty provided by law is more than six years’ imprisonment but not more than ten years’ imprisonment
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0204JUD005090199
4 février 2003
Ever since he has been staying in the EBI, a more unstable, downcast side of [the applicant] has become much more apparent.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1114DEC004618416
14 novembre 2017
    The applicant companies state that 2.1% of all employers in the Netherlands paid wages surpassing EUR 150,000 to one or more employees.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1005JUD006042912
5 octobre 2017
Therefore it was possible to transfer him to a more lenient prison regime in a partly closed prison. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0110DEC000868102
10 janvier 2006
She was short-toured from Bosnia and I suspect you will conclude that on occasions she drank rather more than was good for her.
ECLI:CEDH:001-184196
1 juin 2018
He also complains that the competent national authorities did not display “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings as the courts commenced the hearing of the defendants in April 2013, more
ECLI:CEDH:001-219079
18 juillet 2022
The CEC justified its refusal by reference to Article   31 § 8(2) of the Electoral Code, according to which the applicant company could have only one media outlet with no more than fifty reporters
ECLI:CEDH:002-6711
14 mars 2000
14.3.2000 [Section II] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of administrative proceedings: violation The case concerns the length of proceedings in the administrative court (more
ECLI:CEDH:001-174699
31 mai 2017
The applicant has been unable to have regular contact with his son for more than ten years, despite several court judgments and enforcement orders in his favour.
ECLI:CEDH:001-237805
30 septembre 2024
The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention that this regime, which he endures for more than seven years and six months already, amounts to inhuman and degrading treatment.
soc
61372174cd580146773f3e51
21 mars 1991
Philippe X..., demeurant L'Essert, La Ville aux Clercs, Morée (Loir-et-Cher), défendeur à la cassation ; LA COUR, composée selon l'article L. 131-6, alinéa 2, du Code de l'organisation judiciaire,
ECLI:CEDH:001-180805
16 janvier 2018
    QUESTION In the light of the applicants’ claims and the documents which have been submitted, more specifically the documents from the UNHCR, and in light of information set out in the UK
ECLI:CEDH:002-6167
9 novembre 1999
The proceedings lasted 5 years and more than 9 months. Conclusion : violation (unanimous). Article 41: The Court awarded the applicant 120,000 francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0718JUD004037710
18 juillet 2017
The applicant distributed banners and explained that it would be more practicable to stage solo demonstrations.
Page 42 sur 7138