of the European Court of Human Rights in the Zohiou case delivered on 29 March 2001 and transmitted on the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Sawden case delivered on 12 March 2002 and transmitted on the same date to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

Court of Human Rights in the Vanpraet case delivered on 21 April 2005 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Siegl case delivered on 20   June 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &#

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Tolli case delivered on 28 April 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Di Deco case delivered on 12 April 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme Pandy contre Belgique   (Requête n o 13583/02, arrêt du 21 septembre 2006, définitif le 3 janvier 2007)     Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Janssen case delivered on 20 December 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Jardim Travassos Moura Gaspar case delivered on 12 April 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers the same day under Article 46 of the Convention

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ferreira Martins case delivered on 12 April 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers the same day under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

Court of Human Rights in the Walter case delivered on 28 November 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kortak case delivered on 31 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

III case delivered on 2 November 1999 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 37188/97)

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Akin case delivered on 4 July 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Dunan case delivered on 30 October 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kaplan case delivered on 26 February 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Konček case delivered on 26 November 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Linard case delivered on 25   June 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Perié case delivered on 26 September 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Fanelli case delivered on 8 March 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that