CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0719JUD006316013
19 juillet 2022
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 c) OF THE CONVENTION 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0705JUD002218306
5 juillet 2012
This complaint falls to be examined under Article   6   §   1 taken together with Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention. Those provisions, in so far as relevant, read as follows: “1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD003670512
12 janvier 2017
He relied on Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD007296216
18 mars 2021
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 25.     The applicants complained that they had not had a fair trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD002832803
10 mai 2012
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0903JUD000304205
3 septembre 2013
In this respect, he relied on Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0430JUD006633809
30 avril 2015
    On 12 June 2008 the Court found a violation of Article 3 and Article   6   §§1 and 3 (c). The Court established in particular that: “67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1025JUD003604007
25 octobre 2016
  6   §§   1 and 3   (d) of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0917JUD002969909
17 septembre 2015
He invoked Article   6   §§   1 and 3   (c) of the Convention, the relevant part of which read as follows: “1. ...
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-14472
12 juin 2025
République tchèque - 23963/21 Arrêt 12.6.2025 [Section V] Article 6 Article 6-1 Procès équitable Article 6-3-c Se défendre avec l'assistance d'un défenseur Condamnation pénale d’une personne atteinte d
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD004309505
28 novembre 2013
    The Court notes at the outset that the requirements of Article   6 §   3 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1, and the applicant
ECLI:CEDH:002-10945
19 novembre 2015
Russie - 46998/08 Arrêt 19.11.2015 [Section I] Article 6 Procédure administrative Article 6-1 Accusation en matière pénale Procès équitable Article 6-3-c Assistance gratuite d'un avocat d'office Absence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD005442414
17 décembre 2019
There has therefore been a violation of Article   6   §§   1 and   3   (d) of the Convention. Mr Starkov’s complaints concerning free legal assistance 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0430JUD006305309
He invoked Article   6   §§   1 and 3   (c) of the Convention, the relevant part of which read as follows: “1.     ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329JUD004708212
29 mars 2016
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3(d) OF THE CONVENTION 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD003809405
19 décembre 2013
the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 should be examined together (see Vacher v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD002304007
24 avril 2018
    The above-mentioned considerations are sufficient for the Court to find that there has been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention on that account (see and compare Truten
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0126JUD006080209
26 janvier 2017
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD005653908
3 octobre 2013
    The Court considers that there has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention. II.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 49.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD003736405
6 octobre 2016
    The Government submitted that the applicant had waived his right under Article 6   §   3   (c) of the Convention.
Page 42 sur 58499
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.