The first, to the effect that a law had been applied retrospectively, was rejected because in the Court’s view that had not been the case, and even if there had been retrospective application, the principles

said they had been having.

In the instant case there had been no action of that type.

the applicant at the same time as denying ever having been present.

They further argued that the extraordinary appeal had been lodged in the interest of the applicants and had been rendered necessary by the complexity and extreme sensitivity of the case.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that she had been unlawfully detained because she could not pay a fine and that her procedural rights had been infringed. 4.

In its report of 25 October 1999 (former Article   31 of the Convention), it expressed the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (26 votes to 1), that there had been

He maintained that he had not been allowed to prove that his comments were true and had not been informed that the charges had been dropped by the prosecution when the article appeared.

and degrading conditions in which the applicant had been detained...

27567/04, 27580/04, 27610/04 by Milan VERK and 9 Others against Slovenia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 6   May   2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep

03, 33952/03, 34985/03, 34994/03 Simona VAHEN and 8 others against Slovenia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 27   March 2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep

    On 16 March 2012 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with the following content: “The Government acknowledge that there has been a breach

38996/05, 44993/05, 45003/05 by Aleš VOVK and 6 others against Slovenia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 17   February 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep

04, 1453/05 and 35036/05 by Dejan ŠPEGLIČ and 4 Others against Slovenia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 16   December 2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep

Italy , no. 29569/95, § 53, ECHR 1999-VI), the Court considers that his complaint has been adequately and sufficiently remedied (see Sisojeva and Others , cited above, § 102). 24.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.

that the rules of fair competition had thus been infringed. 7.

Italy , no. 29569/95, § 53, ECHR 1999-VI), the Court considers that her complaint has been adequately and sufficiently remedied (see Sisojeva and Others , cited above, § 102). 25.

He was committed to dealing with his addiction and at the date of his deportation appeal, he had been drug-free for a number of months.

It found that the applicant had not been the owner of the property at the time the lease was concluded and that the defendant company had therefore been entitled to terminate the lease. 10.